Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

***Forum Software Change***

Hi folks,

For those of you living under a rock, we have decided to completely change the software platform that this forum is operated by. We continue to strive to provide a high quality, spam free, professional, modern place where those involved in the building code arena can exchange information. We will be swapping to the new software in the next few days. A few more reminders in addition to the several emails that I sent out:

1) You will be required to reset your password. That is just the way it is. You will be prompted initially and there are very obvious links for you to click on for a password reset or reminder.
2) Make sure that your email address is up to date. If you signed up under an email that is no longer in use, we have no way to get a hold of you.
3) The swap is happening and happening soon. All of the log in links and main page will be the same URL so you should not have to create a new one. That part should be seamless.
4) We already changed servers to a faster one last week and unless I told you, you would never know. This is all setting the stage.
5) The forum will look similar but you will have to spend time looking around, figuring out how to do everything. It is a much, much better platform. This is a whine free zone.

***We asked for money to help offset the costs and a few very dedicated people really stepped up to the plate. We fell short of our goal and the costs are more than was estimated. I want to thank those few people that helped us to keep this forum up and running. AS A RESULT of falling short of our goal and the fact that 99.9% of the users did not help, there will be some permission changes happening over the next few weeks. We need everyone to step up and appreciate the value of this forum.

Thank you,

Jeff Remas
Administrator
2 of 2 < >

Plan Review Services

Advanced Code Group (ACG) has been performing plan review services for municipalities, architectural firms, third-party agencies, contractors and code officials for over 10 years with great success and response. We would be happy to assist you with your I-Code plan review needs, whether on a limited or full time basis. Plan review is performed by several experienced inspectors, certified as plan reviewers in different disciplines. We offer expedited plan review services electronically. This has been a well received process that eliminates reprinting of drawings. At the end of plan review, you have the option to accept an electronic stamp on the plans or submit the final, approved drawings for traditional stamping with return via FedEx. Why print, submit then print changes and submit again when this can be done just once?

We will always do our best to work within your budget and allotted timeframe. Feel free to contact our office at 1-877-223-4462 or email us at codes@inspectpa.com for further information or just to discuss your needs.

Thank you,

Jeff Remas
Advanced Code Group
www.InspectPA.com
See more
See less

allowable building area (frontage and sprinklered),

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • allowable building area (frontage and sprinklered),

    The single story sprinklered building in question is open 21' on the sides, 41' in back, and fronts the public way open with 60'

    The formula below only considers frontage and sprinklers.

    Question:where in the code does the building get any increase for the sides and back yards in addition to this formula, or does it?
    (my understanding is it has to be 60 all sides to be unlimited)

    Aa = At + [(At)(If)/100] + [(At)(Is)/100] = ______________________

    Thanks,
    Keith
    Last edited by Keith; March 29th, 2011, 14:31.

  • #2
    from the 2006

    506.2 Frontage increase.

    Every building shall adjoin or have access to a public way to receive an area increase for frontage. Where a building has more than 25 percent of its perimeter on a public way or open space having a minimum width of 20 feet (6096 mm), the frontage increase shall be determined in accordance with the following:

    If = [F / P – 0.25] W / 30 (Equation 5-2)

    where:

    If = Area increase due to frontage.

    F = Building perimeter that fronts on a public way or open space having 20 feet (6096 mm) open minimum width (feet).

    P = Perimeter of entire building (feet).

    W = Width of public way or open space (feet) in accordance with Section 506.2.1.

    Comment


    • #3
      The open space on rear and sides counts as frontage-- would be better titiled open space increase.

      Where the width of the open space on the same lot or to the far side of the public way varies, you can break up the portions and integrate over the perimiter to get a weighted average W.
      W/30 at any point shall not exceed 1, except if all other unlimited area building requirements are met then it can have a maximum value of 2.

      From 2009 IBC
      506.2 Frontage increase. Every building shall adjoin or have access to a public way to receive a building area increase for frontage. Where a building has more than 25 percent of its perimeter on a public way or open space having a minimum width of 20 feet (6096 mm), the frontage increase shall be determined in accordance with the following:

      If=[F/P-0.25]W/30

      (Equation 5-2)

      where:

      If= Area increase due to frontage.

      F = Building perimeter that fronts on a public way or open space having 20 feet (6096 mm) open minimum width (feet).

      P = Perimeter of entire building (feet).

      W = Width of public way or open space (feet) in accordance with Section 506.2.1.
      506.2.1 Width limits. The value of W shall be at least 20 feet (6096 mm). Where the value of W varies along the perimeter of the building, the calculation performed in accordance with Equation 5-2 shall be based on the weighted average of each portion of exterior wall and open space where the value of W is greater than or equal to 20 feet (6096 mm). Where the value of W exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), a value of 30 feet (9144 mm) shall be used in calculating the weighted average, regardless of the actual width of the open space. Where two or more buildings are on the same lot, W shall be measured from the exterior face of a building to the exterior face of an opposing building, as applicable.

      Exception: The value of W divided by 30 shall be permitted to be a maximum of 2 when the building meets all requirements of Section 507 except for compliance with the 60-foot (18 288 mm) public way or yard requirement, as applicable.

      506.2.2 Open space limits. Such open space shall be either on the same lot or dedicated for public use and shall be accessed from a street or approved fire lane.

      Comment


      • #4
        To add to Coug Dad's and Frank's post, since you have two yards that are less than 30 feet, you have to calculate a "weighted" W instead of using W=30.

        W/30 cannot exceed 1, therefore W cannot be more than 30. If your building could qualify for unlimited area but the only thing preventing that from happening is the 60-foot yards all around, then W/30 cannot exceed 2, thus W cannot be more than 60.

        Assuming the former, to calculate a weighted W, you have to know what your building perimeter is. For the sake of an example, let's assume your building is 100 feet by 200 feet, with the 100-foot portions having the 21-foot yards.

        Since the front has a yard that exceeds 30 feet, W=30 for that portion, as well as the back with its 41-foot yard. For the sides, W=21. To calculate the weighted average, take each W and multiply it by the portion of the perimeter that W is applicable, sum the totals up and divide by the total perimeter of the building. Using the example building, the calculation would be as follows:

        Weighted W = [(30' x 200') + (30' x 200') + (21' x 100') + (21' x 100')]/600'

        Weighted W = 27'

        Therefore, your calculation for If would be as follows:

        If = [600'/600' - 0.25]27/30
        If = {edit - slight calculation error} 0.675 or 67.5%
        Last edited by RLGA; March 29th, 2011, 12:27.
        Ron Geren
        RLGA Technical Services
        www.specsandcodes.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Great simple explanation Ron!
          Boy it's hot!.....And where are we going in this handbasket?

          Comment


          • #6
            deleted by poster
            Last edited by TJacobs; March 29th, 2011, 12:23. Reason: duplicate info
            Jake

            http://www.nwboca.org

            This response brought to you by one of the paying members of the Building Code Forum.
            You can join the paying members and support this forum, for a small donation at
            http://www.thebuildingcodeforum.com/forum/payments.php

            Comment


            • #7
              I made a calculation error in my earlier post, but I have corrected it. See above.

              Also, you're welcome, steveray.
              Ron Geren
              RLGA Technical Services
              www.specsandcodes.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Keith,
                Sec. 506.2.2 Open space limits. Such open space shall be either on the same lot or dedicated for the public use and shall be accessed from a street or approved fire lane.
                Common mistake made when calculating frontage increase - is that rear yard is taken into account and there is no APPROVED FIRE LANE for rear yard access. In your case at least one of your 21 ft wide side yards shall serve as an approved fire lane. Landscaped yards are not considered approved fire lane. In most cases 20 ft wide paving with hummer-head turn around for fire engine will satisfy this requirement (check with your fire department for the definition of approved fire lane).
                An example for frontage increase calculation (using weighted average for variable depths of yards) and actual frontage increase calculator is included within “Building Code Height and Area Calculator” at
                www.ara4help.com

                Comment


                • #9
                  Does anyone have the commentary for section 506.2.2?
                  I may have made that mistake, I don't recall a specific project, but it's a matter of interpretation. I have always interpreted that the access could be through the side yard to the street. If no side yards, then no using the back yard. Anyone else?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The open space must have access to a public way or fire lane. You cannot access one open space (i.e. back yard) through another open space (i.e. side yard), unless the through open space is a fire lane. This is based on the IBC Commentary.

                    If the back open space of Keith's building did not have an alley, diveway to a public way, or fire lane through one of the side yards, then the back open space cannot be included in the frontage increase.

                    However, as MarkRandall states, it's a matter of interpretation. Since the Commentary is not code, I've seen BO's allow yards for the frontage increase if all portions of the building exterior are within the distance prescribed in IFC Section 503.1.1.
                    Ron Geren
                    RLGA Technical Services
                    www.specsandcodes.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The commentary is not the code and is not adopted as such.

                      Where the commentary states that there are additional requirements beyond those listed in the code, it is no longer a legitimate interpretation of the code as written.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        shall be accessed from a street or approved fire lane.
                        [F] FIRE LANE. A road or other passageway developed to allow the passage of fire apparatus. A fire lane is not necessarily intended for vehicular traffic other than fire apparatus.
                        Common mistake made when calculating frontage increase - is that rear yard is taken into account and there is no APPROVED FIRE LANE for rear yard access
                        Disagree Not all building access is provided by public streets so the option of an approved fire lane is allowed but not required. The open space areas have to have access to a public street or fire lane. Nothing prohibits accessing one open space from another

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by mtlogcabin View Post
                          [F] FIRE LANE. A road or other passageway developed to allow the passage of fire apparatus. A fire lane is not necessarily intended for vehicular traffic other than fire apparatus.

                          Disagree Not all building access is provided by public streets so the option of an approved fire lane is allowed but not required. The open space areas have to have access to a public street or fire lane. Nothing prohibits accessing one open space from another
                          I think intend of the code is to provide sufficient space for fire apparatus access to fight the fire, and not just any width of access thru other open spaces.
                          Letís say the only access from the public way to the 40 ft wide rear yard is thru a 3 ft side yard. Would you use the rear yard for frontage increase? If yes, then what is the minimum width for the side yard to be considered an access?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            mtlogcabin:

                            I concur, but look in the 2009 Commentary (Before everyone starts posting that the Commentary is not code, I know that and said it previously; however, BOs will look at the Commentary to support their positions) at Figure 506.2.2(1) on page 5-19, which shows a building with a yard to the south accessible by a road, a 15' yard on the west, a 20' yard on the east, and a 100' yard on the north. The figure has no fire lane to the north yard and there is no alley, drive, etc. to the north yard. The Commentary text regarding the figure states:

                            "Example 1: In Figure 506.2.2(1), the south and east side of the building facing the street can be considered open perimeter (frontage). The north side of the building cannot be considered open perimeter for purposes of the increase, since it is not accessible from the street or a fire lane. Even though the 20-foot-wide yard can be included in open frontage because it does not provide a fire lane to the rear of the building, the 100-foot yard cannot be included."

                            The Commentary clearly provides an interpretation that is not directly supported by actual code text (however, it may have been the intent), but many BOs use the Commentary as the basis for their own interpretations.
                            Ron Geren
                            RLGA Technical Services
                            www.specsandcodes.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ara4help,
                              My interpretation has been a yard that's large enough to be counted towards area increases (20'). As long as the yards are contiguous, not sure why it would matter. Fire personnel need room to move around the building to fight the fire. There's distances in the fire code of 150' to fire access and this number can be increased per IFC503.1.1 exception 1. As long as you meet the distances, I think you should be fine.
                              I also agree the commentary is not code, thanks RLGA for posting that. I've been known to change my opinion based on what it says, but so far, I'm not convinced to change my interpretation.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X