1 of 2 < >

***Forum Software Change***

Hi folks,

For those of you living under a rock, we have decided to completely change the software platform that this forum is operated by. We continue to strive to provide a high quality, spam free, professional, modern place where those involved in the building code arena can exchange information. We will be swapping to the new software in the next few days. A few more reminders in addition to the several emails that I sent out:

1) You will be required to reset your password. That is just the way it is. You will be prompted initially and there are very obvious links for you to click on for a password reset or reminder.
2) Make sure that your email address is up to date. If you signed up under an email that is no longer in use, we have no way to get a hold of you.
3) The swap is happening and happening soon. All of the log in links and main page will be the same URL so you should not have to create a new one. That part should be seamless.
4) We already changed servers to a faster one last week and unless I told you, you would never know. This is all setting the stage.
5) The forum will look similar but you will have to spend time looking around, figuring out how to do everything. It is a much, much better platform. This is a whine free zone.

***We asked for money to help offset the costs and a few very dedicated people really stepped up to the plate. We fell short of our goal and the costs are more than was estimated. I want to thank those few people that helped us to keep this forum up and running. AS A RESULT of falling short of our goal and the fact that 99.9% of the users did not help, there will be some permission changes happening over the next few weeks. We need everyone to step up and appreciate the value of this forum.

Thank you,

Jeff Remas
2 of 2 < >

Plan Review Services

Advanced Code Group (ACG) has been performing plan review services for municipalities, architectural firms, third-party agencies, contractors and code officials for over 10 years with great success and response. We would be happy to assist you with your I-Code plan review needs, whether on a limited or full time basis. Plan review is performed by several experienced inspectors, certified as plan reviewers in different disciplines. We offer expedited plan review services electronically. This has been a well received process that eliminates reprinting of drawings. At the end of plan review, you have the option to accept an electronic stamp on the plans or submit the final, approved drawings for traditional stamping with return via FedEx. Why print, submit then print changes and submit again when this can be done just once?

We will always do our best to work within your budget and allotted timeframe. Feel free to contact our office at 1-877-223-4462 or email us at for further information or just to discuss your needs.

Thank you,

Jeff Remas
Advanced Code Group
See more
See less

Horizontal reinforcement for basement foundation walls

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Horizontal reinforcement for basement foundation walls

    I never noticed it before but Table R404.1.1(5) does not give the horizontal reinforcement for concrete foundation walls... only vertical.

    But every engineered wall will note both horizontal and vertical.

    And so I spent today building an easy-to-use spreadsheet that will calculate the minimum steel reinforcement for grade beams and trench footing based on the book, "Simplified Engineering for Architects & Engineers".

    The results are consistent with the IRC table for plain concrete (no reinforcement necessary).

    Is there anything out there that would justify and/or help calculate the minimum size and spacing for horizontal rebar?


    ICC Certified Building Plan Examiner

  • #2
    The IBC references ACI 318 which in turn sets minimum reinforcement spacing and ratios. Specifically ACI 318 Sections 7.6 & 7.12.


    • #3
      Horizontal for UN-Supported concrete walls is here

      R404.1.2.2 Reinforcement for foundation walls. Concrete foundation walls shall be laterally supported at the
      top and bottom.
      Horizontal reinforcement shall be provided in accordance with Table R404.1.2(1). ......
      That table only adresses UNSUPPORTED Walls


      • #4
        Engineers will typically put in steel for temperature and shrinkage. For 60 ksi reinforcement, the minimum area of steel is equal to 0.0018 x the gross area of the wall for temp and shrinkage reinforcement.


        • #5
          Check out footnote l on table r404.1.1(5). You gotta read the fine print.


          • #6
            I point this out a lot on plans to look at footnote (l) as well as footenote (g).

            (l) makes a lot of upset people, usually because they haden't noticed they needed any vert. rebar but (g) sometimes gets them happy once again.


            • #7
              Daywalker and rktect,
              You must be using 2012 IRC or some Chicago Mafia/Union code. I could not find a fifth table R404.1.1(5). Is this something provided by your local amendments?

              Mark K,
              According to ACI 318, 7.6.5; The practical minimum for my grade beams is to have HORIZONTAL rebar spaced no more than 18 inches on center. Otherwise, we would be talking about a concrete wall thickness less than 6 inches ... and we will never see that.
              Phil & Mark,
              As for ACI, 7.12; I appreciate this minimum to control shrinkage when my calculations for required area of steel to resist tension is nearly zero.

              Table R404.1.2(1); This is great. Considering that I see most cast-in-place basement walls poured at 9 ft. tall or more, I will always expect to see at least one #4 bar top, one in the middle, one near the bottom. But I do not know how this jives with ACI 318, 7.6.5 which appears to have a minimum of 18 inches on center.

              Originally I was only concerned with grade beams that were either 36 or 42 inches deep. But now I realize that these can be plain concrete unless subject to unusual or extreme loads. As a result of this study, I get the idea that horizontal reinforcement for foundations is never a major concern. Three #4 bar should always do the trick.

              Thanks everyone.



              • #8
                I'm using standard IRC 2006 table 404.1.1(5)

                You were the one who referenced 404.1.1(5) originally.

                What are you using?
                Last edited by rktect 1; April 7th, 2011, 10:50.


                • #9
                  Oops, IRC Table 404.1.1(5) is easily found in the hard copy but not the online version. That's weird.


                  • #10
                    I feel like I am the only plans examiner enforcing this section.

                    Everytime I mention vertical rebar, contractors and architects go nuts.

                    Anybody else actually writing reviews with vert. rebar notes?


                    • #11
                      Sometimes 10" poured walls can have no rebar at all. Go figure. I think that the 2009 has more stringent requirements but I just got my copy yesterday and have not really jumped in yet.
                      Now accepting advertising.....


                      • #12
                        I get rebar specified frequently. Usually verticals with (2) #4 within 12" of the top of the wall.

                        9' wall with 8' of unbalanced backfill can be 8" thick without reinforcing if you use 4000psi.


                        • #13
                          Vertical re-bar.......standard procedure around here. Been enforcing it for about the last 2 years, ever since we adopted the international 2006 codes.
                          I do the plan review and the inspections. Took alot of effort on my part to educate the concrete guys. The cry from the wilderness was loud.


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TimNY View Post
                            I get rebar specified frequently. Usually verticals with (2) #4 within 12" of the top of the wall.

                            9' wall with 8' of unbalanced backfill can be 8" thick without reinforcing if you use 4000psi.
                            Only if you have the right soil. Around here we don't have a lot of GW,GP, SW or SP. Even though the architects tell me it is so, the soils report does not.

                            Take a look at table 405.1.


                            • #15
                              rktect.. true that, I am blessed with GW.

                              No soil type was specified.. so it cannot be said that every wall requires reinforcing.

                              I'm familiar with the table ;)