• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

No More Sharpies NEC 408.4

jar546

jar546

Forum Coordinator
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
11,041
Location
Somewhere Too Hot & Humid
Here is the language for 2017 NFPA 70

(B) Source of Supply. All switchboards, switchgear, and panelboards
supplied by a feeder(s) in other than one- or two-family
dwellings shall be permanently marked to indicate each device
or equipment where the power originates. The label shall be
permanently affixed, of sufficient durability to withstand the
environment involved, and not handwritten.
 
jar546 said:
So you decide what to and not to enforce based on your personal opinion even when aware of a violation?
Click to expand...
The question is, out of all the things that we need to enforce, is this a priority for the AHJ. So one has the resources to enforce & inspect every single element of the codes. The question for the AHJ is where that line is drawn. Most will prioritize based on life safety.

FLSTF01 said:
not handwritten........As long as it is legible, I have better things to enforce.
Click to expand...
This is a perfect example. Does it meet the intent of the code (legibility)? Are you willing to go to court to get compliance?
 
tmurray said:
This is a perfect example. Does it meet the intent of the code (legibility)? Are you willing to go to court to get compliance?
Click to expand...
Unfortunately the section is very specific and we will be clearly negligent if we do not enforce this...And sued personally and be fired professionally....
 
In the real world, doing electrical panel upgrades, you do the inspection, write them up for something, go back re-inspect, say okay, call the POCO to re-set the meter unless the POCO is waiting on site, tell them the panel has to be marked. Then you go back and do a third inspection this time with the homeowner and then find they marked the panel with a crayon or sharpie.
 
We have had it as an amendment since the 2005 cycle in commercial buildings, we rarely get pushback, and always get compliance.
 
steveray said:
Unfortunately the section is very specific and we will be clearly negligent if we do not enforce this...And sued personally and be fired professionally....
Click to expand...

interesting. It sounds like you are not just inspectors, but the guarantor that the construction meets code. That is not the way it is here. Here, the courts have recognized that the AHJ has a duty of care, but limit the standard of care through a enforcement policy due to the financial obligation of an inspection scheme able to prevent all defects (see Anns test).
 
Most commercial projects have a schedule affixed to the panel door or in a clear pocket, and most are in place at final inspection. If not it is noted on the TCO.
 
Pcinspector1 said:
In the real world, doing electrical panel upgrades, you do the inspection, write them up for something, go back re-inspect, say okay, call the POCO to re-set the meter unless the POCO is waiting on site, tell them the panel has to be marked. Then you go back and do a third inspection this time with the homeowner and then find they marked the panel with a crayon or sharpie.
Click to expand...

If they are only upgrading the main panel you would not be looking at the sub panel (where the label is required) anyway.
If they are upgrading or adding a sub panel too you can point out this at the rough inspection and still pass the service inspection.
 
Rick18071 said:
If they are only upgrading the main panel you would not be looking at the sub panel (where the label is required) anyway.
If they are upgrading or adding a sub panel too you can point out this at the rough inspection and still pass the service inspection.
Click to expand...

Being overzealous, I always track down and inspect sub-panels.. The electrician usually hasn't seen it....many don't know where it is.
 
You know I was just sharing information and apparently this is an issue of contentiousness. Just like all of the other codes we are here to enforce, it is yet another one that makes sense, especially to those that worked and/or still work as an electrician. I really don't see the big deal and like all other codes, eventually the contractors get it and comply automatically. I hear constant complaining about non-compliance found by inspectors and yet we have some who don't want to enforce this because it is too petty. You are the ones setting and example for the industry.

I do inspections in a few different municipalities, some only as a fill in and I can tell you without a doubt that when I do inspections in areas where the electrical inspector is meticulous and holds people to the code, I pass close to 100% of the inspections because the contractors are conditioned to actually meeting the minimum code requirements. When I go to areas that have weaker inspectors, it shows and the failure rate is significant. I was in one town for 3 weeks doing 4-10 inspections a day before I passed a final on the first try.

To those that don't want to hold up a CO because of a failed inspection due to 408.4, shame on you for taking on something that is not yours to take on and deciding what you want to and don't want to enforce. It is a simple fix and will be done with a reinspection. It should have been done right the first time. Good electricians take the time to mark their panels and mark them the right way. Many have printed stickers with the panel schedule on them.

As an electrician I am tired of trying to find panel locations and figure out what circuit and or feeder goes where because of poor labeling because of poor enforcement which does create a hazardous situation in some cases. Get over yourselves and do your job and stop whining about what you're holding up. Give me a break. Most of you create the problems in your head that you think you will have if you do your job rather than just doing what you are suppose to and letting the chips fall where they may.

Rant over.
 
tmurray said:
interesting. It sounds like you are not just inspectors, but the guarantor that the construction meets code. That is not the way it is here. Here, the courts have recognized that the AHJ has a duty of care, but limit the standard of care through a enforcement policy due to the financial obligation of an inspection scheme able to prevent all defects (see Anns test).
Click to expand...

(Amd) 104.1 General. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce the
provisions of this code. The building official shall have the authority to adopt policies and
procedures to clarify the application of its provisions. Such policies and procedures shall comply
with the intent and purpose of this code. Such policies and procedures shall not have the effect
of waiving requirements specifically provided for in this code, nor shall they have the effect of
establishing requirements in excess of those set forth in this code.
 
jar546 said:
You know I was just sharing information and apparently this is an issue of contentiousness. Just like all of the other codes we are here to enforce, it is yet another one that makes sense, especially to those that worked and/or still work as an electrician. I really don't see the big deal and like all other codes, eventually the contractors get it and comply automatically. I hear constant complaining about non-compliance found by inspectors and yet we have some who don't want to enforce this because it is too petty. You are the ones setting and example for the industry.
Rant over.
Click to expand...

So you exposed an overbearing code and a few people said it stinks....which it does. If a panel is poorly labeled I ask them to do it over. Now I get to ask them to do it over with a label maker. From the beginning a magic marker was good enough.....now all of the sudden it’s not. I call bullshlt on that one. But hey now I can’t look weak or willing to give a little because if they don’t own a label maker they ain’t electricians.
 
ICE said:
So you exposed an overbearing code and a few people said it stinks....which it does. If a panel is poorly labeled I ask them to do it over. Now I get to ask them to do it over with a label maker. From the beginning a magic marker was good enough.....now all of the sudden it’s not. I call bullshlt on that one. But hey now I can’t look weak or willing to give a little because if they don’t own a label maker they ain’t electricians.
Click to expand...

First of all this is not for one and two family dwellings, it is for commercial and it is for the panel itself, not the circuits. Once again, no one reads and doesn't like something because they think it is something that it is not. Come on, most commercial installs come with labels anyway when you order them.
 
"First of all this is not for one and two family dwellings, it is for commercial and it is for the panel itself, not the circuits."

Why do you think that I can't read. I already know it is commercial. I saw the part about "indicate each device or equipment where the power originates". That has no effect on the facts.

The cheap strip labels will fall off....so this is going to be a problem "the label shall be permanently affixed, of sufficient durability to withstand the environment involved, and not handwritten. That's going to require a plaque....a red and white phenolic plaque like the ones for the AIC rating. That shouldn't be more than another $50. If this code came out 50 years ago it would have been a brass plate.
 
Pcinspector1 said:
kennedy, There should be a code violation for that?
Click to expand...

If you lived in the Miami area you
ICE said:
"First of all this is not for one and two family dwellings, it is for commercial and it is for the panel itself, not the circuits."

Why do you think that I can't read. I already know it is commercial. I saw the part about "indicate each device or equipment where the power originates". That has no effect on the facts.

The cheap strip labels will fall off....so this is going to be a problem "the label shall be permanently affixed, of sufficient durability to withstand the environment involved, and not handwritten. That's going to require a plaque....a red and white phenolic plaque like the ones for the AIC rating. That shouldn't be more than another $50. If this code came out 50 years ago it would have been a brass plate.
Click to expand...

In the early 90's I was using a labeler when I worked in a large industrial plant. We labeled a lot of panels and exterior services/distribution panels. There are a lot of products out there that will do the job easily and an entire industry that has already existing. This is nothing new just new to you. If an electrician thinks they are going to Staples to buy a cheap labeler then yes, they will have problems. There are and have been a lot of products out there that easily handle this situation. We need to stop worrying about the ability of the contractor to do their job and make them do their job by doing our job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top