• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

ADA Changes On The Horizon

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,892
Location
So. CA
ADA Changes On The Horizon

http://www.beac.com/news/ada-changes-horizon

By Sheryl Reuben, Reuben & Junius LLP

There has been a steady increase in the number of civil lawsuits in San Francisco that allege ADA, Unruh Act, California Building Code, and/or San Francisco Building Code accessibility infractions. In fact, the Office of Small Business found that more than 300 San Francisco businesses have been sued since 2005 for alleged ADA violations. In this update we review the current laws that govern accessibility, and some recent proposals for change.

Federal and State Disabled Access Laws

The federal Americans with Disabilities Act was enacted in 1990 to prohibit discrimination based on disabilities and to ensure equal opportunity and access for persons with disabilities. Individuals with disabilities are defined as those having physical and/or mental impairments that substantially limit a life activity. Many San Francisco small businesses fall under Title III provisions and are required under federal law to adhere to certain physical specifications. For example, the door to restrooms in public facilities must be considered accessible. Accessible doors are at least 36” wide, fitted with lever-type hardware, and must not swing into required “clear areas.” The list goes on.

The Unruh Civil Rights Act of 1959 is a supplementary California law that “provides protection from discrimination by all business establishments in California, including housing and public accommodations.” The Unruh Act covers more individuals than the federal ADA - it extends protection to people with medical conditions and it only requires that the disability or disabilities limit, rather than substantially limit, a major life activity.

The California Building Code (CBC) and San Francisco Building Code (SFBC) are analogous to ADA provisions in many ways because they provide procedural and accessibility guidelines for building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, housing, and energy systems for the State in general, and San Francisco, in particular. The San Francisco Department of Buildings and Inspection is responsible for enforcing these codes for small businesses. Most small businesses that provide goods and services to the public are required to comply with accessibility related laws, from the federal level to the city level. The conundrum is that many ADA regulations do not perfectly align to city and state regulations, thus creating confusion regarding necessary compliance and increased liability amongst small business owners and landlords. In addition, some San Francisco small business owners who have been sued had erroneously assumed that their initial procurement of city permits and licenses served as proofs of compliance with all accessibility laws, which is not necessarily the case.

Proposals for Change

Recently, legislation in Sacramento has been proposed in order to curb, what some see as abusive Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuits. California State Senate President Darrell Steinberg and State Senator Bob Dutton have co-sponsored SB1186, which would prohibit plaintiffs and their attorneys from threatening small businesses with “settlement demand” letters under the pretense of alleged ADA violations and require a written accessibility violation letter to be sent to a landlord or small business owner at least 30 days before a suit can be filed. It also compels commercial landlords to inform small business tenants whether their buildings are state-certified as ADA compliant. Some who oppose the proposed bill, like Margaret Johnson of the advocacy group Disability Rights California, believe that rules like the 30-day notice requirement would breach the civil rights of individuals with disabilities. Proponents of the bill, such as US Senator Dianne Feinstein, believe that the amended statute will diminish what some say are frivolous lawsuits linked to ADA compliance. The measure has passed the California Senate by a vote of 36-0, and is currently in the Assembly.

David Chiu, President of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, has also introduced an ordinance that seeks to reduce the volume of ADA disability access lawsuits. Entitled “Disability Access Improvements for Small Business and Landlord Obligations,” the ordinance would require commercial landlords leasing to small businesses for public accommodations to bring all ground-floor entrances and exits into compliance with current access laws at the time a new lease is signed or an existing one is renewed. Furthermore, property owners would be required to inform small business tenants of all applicable federal and state accessibility law requirements. Lastly, the new ordinance would allow expedited permitting for entities pursuing accessibility improvements. The proposal is currently being reviewed and may be modified before being sent to the San Francisco Land Use Committee in late July.

Where to Go For Help

Whether or not the proposed bills are signed into law, compliance with Federal, State, and City regulations is essential. For a fee, a certified access specialist will inspect a property and grant Certified Access Specialist Program (CASp) Certification. Under the Construction-Related Accessibility Standards Compliance Act, business owners are granted special legal rights for utilizing a specialist, which can help defend against accessibility related lawsuits. There are a number of free resources that businesses can access for Federal, State, and local guidelines: the national ADA website at http://www.ada.gov for the 2010 ADA Standards, ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), and the ADA Guide for Small Businesses; the San Francisco Office of Small Business Website at http://sfgsa.org/index.aspx?page=3805 or call (415) 554-6134 for information on all federal, state, and city laws pertaining to access requirements - the ADA, the California State Building Code, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, the California Disabled Persons Act, and the Construction-Related Accessibility Standards Compliance Act. Regina Dick-Endrizzi, the Executive Director of the Office of Small Business, is also available to field questions. Her office number is (415) 554-6481. The Department of Justice Toll-Free ADA Information Line is 1-800-514-0301 for business-related inquiries regarding the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

***

Sheryl Reuben acknowledges the assistance of law clerk Joseph Mensah who made substantial contributions to the writing of this article.

The issues discussed in this update are not intended to be legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is established with the recipient. Readers should consult with legal counsel before relying on any of the information contained herein. Reuben & Junius, LLP is a full service real estate law firm. We specialize in land use, development and entitlement law. We also provide a wide range of transactional services, including leasing, acquisitions and sales, formation of limited liability companies and other entities, lending/workout assistance, subdivision and condominium work.

Copyright 2012 Reuben & Junius, LLP. All rights reserved.
 
GBrackins said:
so in Cali the State will certify a building as ADA compliant?
NOT

We do have a CASp program where trained individuals render opinions as to the compliance of buildings and sites with the State of California codes and regulations and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for accessibility.

But the State will NOT certify a building as ADA compliant
 
Disclaimer

I do not edit the articles I post.

I post them for conversation and education.

Not everything on this site is accurate.
 
We do have a CASp program where trained individuals render opinions as to the compliance of buildings and sites with the State of California codes and regulations and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for accessibility.
Mark:

Since the AIA is active in this, why don't they set up a Pro Bono program like the state bar has, so larger architectural firms can provide free services to businesses that can't afford to comply?
 
conarb said:
Mark:Since the AIA is active in this, why don't they set up a Pro Bono program like the state bar has, so larger architectural firms can provide free services to businesses that can't afford to comply?
I can not speak for the AIA, but Why don't you, as a contractor put in windows pro bono, for people that cannot aford them?

It is always easy to discount others services, but never your own.

I do pro bono work through my local Chamber of Commerce. Including Access Compliance Reports.
 
In my experiences with larger, and smaller, architecture firms, pro bono and discounted services are performed. I have known some of these circumstances to not be publicized, in part to humility, but also to not advertise to those who might try to take advantage of their generosity.

A good example, besides the ones Mark gave, would be that in some cases when fees are reduced or waived for community or religious projects. A downside to discounted or pro bono work can be that you don't always get the full attention and best efforts...but then that can be true of when you pay full price too.
 
conarb said:
Since the AIA is active in this, why don't they set up a Pro Bono program like the state bar has, so larger architectural firms can provide free services to businesses that can't afford to comply?
ADA is Mentioned in the INSTITUTE GUIDELINES

The American Institute of Architects, Inc.

INSTITUTE GUIDELINES

to Assist AIA Members, Firms and Components

in Undertaking Pro Bono Service Activities

http://www.aia.org/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab082967.pdf
 
Pro Bono work, Not even a mentioned on the AGC - The Associated General Contractors of America webpage

It is always easy to discount others services and products, but never your own
 
Papio said:
in some cases when fees are reduced or waived for community or religious projects
In 2003 I went into the Contra Costa county Building Department to apply for two permits, one was for window replacements in a home in the unincorporated area of Walnut Creek, the other for voluntary ADA restroom compliance in the large Catholic Church in the Town of Moraga (which contracted with the County to provide building inspection), for both permits I gave them a value of $60,000, I was surprised to see that the fees were substantially higher for the church ADA permit, I asked why and was told that churches were considered commercial money-making institutions so they fell within a higher fee schedule than residential permits.
 
conarb said:
In 2003 I went into the Contra Costa county Building Department to apply for two permits, one was for window replacements in a home in the unincorporated area of Walnut Creek, the other for voluntary ADA restroom compliance in the large Catholic Church in the Town of Moraga (which contracted with the County to provide building inspection), for both permits I gave them a value of $60,000, I was surprised to see that the fees were substantially higher for the church ADA permit, I asked why and was told that churches were considered commercial money-making institutions so they fell within a higher fee schedule than residential permits.
So of course, you paid the difference out of pocket...as Pro Bono
 
conarb said:
Why should I? It's not my fault that building departments rip churches off.
Then why should architects do Pro Bono work for buisness owners that refuse to provide access for the disabled?
 
Mark said:
Then why should architects do Pro Bono work for buisness owners that refuse to provide access for the disabled?
People who believe in something and push for laws granting special privileges to suspect classes shouldn't profit from the enforcement of those laws. I do not believe in special privileges for any groups, in this case I was building a home nearby and a member of the board saw me and asked me to do the work because none of their architect or contractor members could provide the insurance and bonding acceptable to the archdiocese, I employed the architect, obtained an indemnification and hold harmless agreement from my architect agreeable to my insurance and bonding companies, I then provided the insurance and bond with my hold harmless and indemnification agreements acceptable to the attorneys for the archdiocese. I am neither a Christian nor a believer in special treatment for the disabled, just a contractor who could and would meet their requirements, it was strictly business for me. There is a huge amount of liability associated with designing and/or performing ADA compliance work, many insurance companies won't touch it.

BTW, professional services are now excluded from contractors' general liability coverage, I have to get named on the architect's policy as additionally insured, if someone sues the church for ADA noncompliance (not likely with a church) the church will cross complain against me for indemnification and to hold them harmless, I have to tender my defense to the carrier for the architect, not my carrier, if I am found liable the architect's insurance has to pay any damages assessed against me, my carrier is not involved, but they demand a copy of the architect's policy to make sure I am named as additionally insured with a hold harmless and indemnification clause acceptable to them, I had a fight with the archdioceses' attorney over one word in my hold harmless and indemnification clause.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
conarb said:
People who believe in something and push for laws granting special privileges to suspect classes shouldn't profit from the enforcement of those laws.
So, all AIA menbers support the ADA and ALL contractors don't. Therefore AIA menbers shouls provide their service Pro Bono, and cover your a**
 
mark handler said:
NOTWe do have a CASp program where trained individuals render opinions as to the compliance of buildings and sites with the State of California codes and regulations and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for accessibility.

But the State will NOT certify a building as ADA compliant
Thanks for your reply Mark, I was thinking they misquoted or misspoke on that as I know of no state that certifies ADA compliance. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks again!
 
Back
Top