• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Attorney behind 2,100 lawsuits questioned at courthouse

hmmmm.........not really any new news, we know there is this element out there. Don't get me wrong, I still agree with equal access, but not making a living off of it.
 
fatboy said:
hmmmm.........not really any new news, we know there is this element out there. Don't get me wrong, I still agree with equal access, but not making a living off of it.
;-) ..
 
While I agree with not making a living off of it, I wish it was an option everywhere. Many places there is no enforcement of the requirements and handicapped individuals are left hanging with no options. There probably needs to be a middle ground someplace.
 
I wonder if he could sell franchises.

Would it matter if the plaintiff has not been there?

It is not possible to prove that he was never there and he isn't required to provide proof that he was.

If the violation exists, it's a done deal.

The news team is just trying to make him look bad.

He's a lawyer.

Isn't that bad enough.
 
I strongly support access and believe that legal recourse helps achieve compliance but there is a difference between pushing for compliance and making a profit.
 
Back
Top