• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Button

Mark

A certain people can not qualify or do certain jobs because of physical limits, Police, fire, construction trades and medical technicians,

I doubt the guy in the picture can squat and lift 50lbs box of records and put it on a shelve 5 ft off the ground

No blacks, jews or Irish need apply, they wont get along with "us".......
Is not the same as someone who canot physically do a specific job

Rick

The hall is not a "work area" is correct however the wall is providing over exposure to the X-Ray technician from the machine he or she operates numerous times a day.

My dentist office is set up exactly like this. In fact the x-ray equipment is mounted inside a cabinet door above the counter and is located at least 5 ft off the ground.

My advice is let it go the botton is not intended for use by any one but the technician.

1109.12 Controls, operating mechanisms and hardware.

Controls, operating mechanisms and hardware intended for operation by the occupant, including switches that control lighting and ventilation and electrical convenience outlets, in accessible spaces, along accessible routes or as parts of accessible elements shall be accessible .

Exceptions:

1. Operable parts that are intended for use only by service or maintenance personnel shall not be required to be accessible .
 
A radiologist or radiology technician is not a service or maintenance person.

I will never understand why people go to lengths to rationalize ADA non-compliance.

It's like defiant child syndrome.
 
brudgers said:
A radiologist or radiology technician is not a service or maintenance person. I will never understand why people go to lengths to rationalize ADA non-compliance.

It's like defiant child syndrome.
And they wonder why there are a plethora of lawsuits

And why is it mostly access issues that Builder inspectors, plancheckers and building Officials that try to find exceptions to the code.
 
Mark, you said

Make it a key switch... but mount it at 48" max.
Okay, I'm with you, that satisfies the end user need to eliminate tampering.

This is getting interesting.

I have had discussions with clients and architects about key switches in the past... is a key operated electric switch compliant with a requirement that operating the device not require grasping or twisting? Is that phrase applicable here at all?

:confused:
 
I have had discussions with clients and architects about key switches in the past... is a key operated electric switch compliant with a requirement that operating the device not require grasping or twisting? Is that phrase applicable here at all?
It is! 2003 Edition, ICC / ANSI A117.1, Section 309.4, and Section 1109.13 in

the 2006 IBC.

.
 
These doors have automatic lock when the machine is in operation to prevent unauthorized entry and risk to exposure. The button is no more secured from entry whether at 5 ft. or 3 ft. AFF.

Accessibility includes all forms of ambulatory impairments, not just for wheel chairs.

Francis
 
brudgers said:
A radiologist or radiology technician is not a service or maintenance person.
Advisory 205.1 General. Controls covered by 205.1 include, but are not limited to, light switches, circuit breakers, duplexes and other convenience receptacles, environmental and appliance controls, plumbing fixture controls, and security and intercom systems.

This is not a control switch for a portion of the building equipment it is remote switch for a specific piece of equipment. If the button was installed on the x-ray equipment at 52 inches above the finished floor would you make them move it? how about the button on a drill press or a bridgeport mill that is located more than 48 inches above the floor?

5PHC3_AS01


Floor Drill Press, Belt Drive, Swing (In.) 17, Motor HP 1, Phase Single, Voltage 120/240, Hz 60, Amps AC 10.2 / 5.1, Capacity Cast Iron (In.) 3/4, Capacity Steel (In.) NA, Spindle Speed (RPM) 144 to 3615, Number of Speeds 16, Chuck Size (In.) 5/8, Spindle Taper MT2, Spindle Travel (In.) 5, Overall Height (In.) 67-1/2, Overall Width (In.) 30-1/4, Overall Depth (In.) 16
 
mtlogcabin said:
Advisory 205.1 General. Controls covered by 205.1 include, but are not limited to, light switches, circuit breakers, duplexes and other convenience receptacles, environmental and appliance controls, plumbing fixture controls, and security and intercom systems.This is not a control switch for a portion of the building equipment it is remote switch for a specific piece of equipment. If the button was installed on the x-ray equipment at 52 inches above the finished floor would you make them move it? how about the button on a drill press or a bridgeport mill that is located more than 48 inches above the floor?

5PHC3_AS01


Floor Drill Press, Belt Drive, Swing (In.) 17, Motor HP 1, Phase Single, Voltage 120/240, Hz 60, Amps AC 10.2 / 5.1, Capacity Cast Iron (In.) 3/4, Capacity Steel (In.) NA, Spindle Speed (RPM) 144 to 3615, Number of Speeds 16, Chuck Size (In.) 5/8, Spindle Taper MT2, Spindle Travel (In.) 5, Overall Height (In.) 67-1/2, Overall Width (In.) 30-1/4, Overall Depth (In.) 16
It mostly access issues that Builder inspectors, plancheckers and building Officials that try to find exceptions to the code.
 
I don't have to look for an exception to the code about the location of aremote switch to operate a piece of machinery. It is already granted by the state. As for ADA I don't enforce that.

(24) The building official may waive minor building code violations that do not constitute an imminent threat to property or to the health, safety, or welfare of any person.
 
mtlogcabin said:
I don't have to look for an exception to the code about the location of aremote switch to operate a piece of machinery. It is already granted by the state. As for ADA I don't enforce that. (24) The building official may waive minor building code violations that do not constitute an imminent threat to property or to the health, safety, or welfare of any person.
And they wonder why there are a plethora of lawsuits
 
In reality what would happen under he federal ADA. A complaint would be made and maybe it might have to moved to make reasonable accomodations for a specific employee not the general public

In CA somebody could make a couple of grand off of this
 
mtlogcabin said:
In reality what would happen under he federal ADA. A complaint would be made and maybe it might have to moved to make reasonable accomodations for a specific employee not the general public In CA somebody could make a couple of grand off of this
Four grand per violation, but who's counting.... it would be a violation
 
mtlogcabin said:
Advisory 205.1 General. Controls covered by 205.1 include, but are not limited to, light switches, circuit breakers, duplexes and other convenience receptacles, environmental and appliance controls, plumbing fixture controls, and security and intercom systems. This is not a control switch for a portion of the building equipment it is remote switch for a specific piece of equipment. If the button was installed on the x-ray equipment at 52 inches above the finished floor would you make them move it? how about the button on a drill press or a bridgeport mill that is located more than 48 inches above the floor?
5PHC3_AS01
Floor Drill Press, Belt Drive, Swing (In.) 17, Motor HP 1, Phase Single, Voltage 120/240, Hz 60, Amps AC 10.2 / 5.1, Capacity Cast Iron (In.) 3/4, Capacity Steel (In.) NA, Spindle Speed (RPM) 144 to 3615, Number of Speeds 16, Chuck Size (In.) 5/8, Spindle Taper MT2, Spindle Travel (In.) 5, Overall Height (In.) 67-1/2, Overall Width (In.) 30-1/4, Overall Depth (In.) 16
I'll take this seriously...which is probably a mistake. A switch on a piece of equipment is not covered by ADAAG - the third "A" stands for "architectural."

A switch mounted on a wall which controls a piece of equipment, is covered by ADAAG.

The switch on a piece of equipment may or may not comply with ADA or may be outside its scope.

A switch on the wall, is not outside the scope.
 
brudgers said:
I'll take this seriously...which is probably a mistake.
Proposed Accessibility Standards for Medical Diagnostic Equipment

Published in the Federal Register on February 9, 2012.

36 CFR Part 1195

Docket No. ATBCB 2012-0003

http://www.access-board.gov/mde/nprm.pdf

M307 Operable Parts

M307 provides technical criteria for operable parts used by patients to activate, deactivate, or adjust the diagnostic equipment (see defined terms in M102.1). For example, equipment used for an auditory examination may require the patient to press a button when sounds are heard. M307 does not apply to controls used only by health care personnel or others who are not patients.

THESE ARE PROPOSED STANDARDS AND NOT IN EFFECT AT THIS TIME

AT THIS TIME, THE SWITCH IS REQUIRED TO BE LOWERED
 
Rick18071 said:
Button in hall at dentist office for X-ray is 5' high. I think it can only be 48" high for accessibility. There are 5 exam rooms and a button outside of each room in the hall. 2009 IBC & 2003 ANSI. Does any one know of an exemption for this button to not need to be accessible?
ADA doesn't mandate absolute accessibility for all.

That stated, it seems that more and more every day, attempts to have it be this way increase.

Hopefully we do not get to the point of filling in the grand canyon so it may be fully enjoyed by all.

That stated, not all employment opportunities require for access and/or are exempt due to nature/need for physical abilities to perform the work.

Among the factors that would determine this answer will be provision not yet enacted.

Board Releases Proposed Standards for Medical Diagnostic Equipment

Concerning Medical Diagnostic Equipment standards.

All of that stated, I would think the switch should be more secured regardless of the height.

For there are plenty of tall morons out there that might activate the equipment with a "Heck I wonder what this does?" response.
 
My advice is let it go the botton is not intended for use by any one but the technician.

1109.12 Controls, operating mechanisms and hardware.

Controls, operating mechanisms and hardware intended for operation by the occupant, including switches that control lighting and ventilation and electrical convenience outlets, in accessible spaces, along accessible routes or as parts of accessible elements shall be accessible .

Exceptions:

1. Operable parts that are intended for use only by service or maintenance personnel shall not be required to be accessible .

I don't think that this button is only for maintenance or service. It is for an employee that does not do maintenance.

I only enforce PA law and IBC not ADA or or any other law or code. The state checks our accessibility inspections and I could lose my cert if I don't get it right.

if the button was in a work area I wouldn't care if it was 10' high but the IBC says that you can't have a work area in a hall.

They can go to the apeal board if they don't like it.
 
I only enforce PA law and IBC not ADA or or any other law or code.
From the 2006 IBC, Section 1101.2 = Design:Buildings and facilities shall be designed

and constructed to be accessible in accordance with this code and ICC A117.1.

Under Section 1109.13 (2006 IBC), ...the control switch for the X-Ray mo-sheen

will have to be lowered, ..possibly locked to prevent tampering / unauthorized use.

.
 
Back
Top