High rise building constructed in 1986. I am looking at this for a State of California tenant. The CBC will allow this as the stair enclosures cannot be made larger to add an additional tread to reduce the riser height to 7" or less. There is a mechanism for this to be allowed in the CBC. My issue is compliance with the ADA per the State of California lease requirements. It seems as if there may be an allowance for up to 3/8" of variance along the stair run, but I am at 1/2". Previously the State has issued a letter that they know of this shortfall and have accepted it in writing, but now they are trying not to do that and are looking to me for a solution that would comply with the ADA requirements 4.9.2. What can be done in this instance ?
Also there are 4 elevators in the building. Only one of which can meet the size requirement of 54" x 80" . The others (3) are at 78.5 x 55. We have signed this elevator as the accessible elevator and installed call buttons specifically for this elevator so a disabled person can use this cab specifically if needed. They are questioning if this would comply with ADA 4.1.3 requiring that "all" passenger elevators comply. Once again CBC would allow this as the elevator shafts cannot be made larger without undo hardship but I do not see where this is allowed by the ADA?
Any direction on this would be appreciated
Also there are 4 elevators in the building. Only one of which can meet the size requirement of 54" x 80" . The others (3) are at 78.5 x 55. We have signed this elevator as the accessible elevator and installed call buttons specifically for this elevator so a disabled person can use this cab specifically if needed. They are questioning if this would comply with ADA 4.1.3 requiring that "all" passenger elevators comply. Once again CBC would allow this as the elevator shafts cannot be made larger without undo hardship but I do not see where this is allowed by the ADA?
Any direction on this would be appreciated