• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Can truncated domes be within path of travel?

runbird

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
5
CBC Sec 1107A.1-A, where the path of travel needs to be clear and unobstructed......my interpretation of this is code is that truncated domes cannot be within the path of travel since I consider them to be an obstruction. Does anyone know if this is a correct interpretation? or can you have truncated domes as part of your path of travel?
 
I am not familiar with the cite, however definitions are often the key to codes. In MA where I am we use the term accessible route that has specific criteria which would not consider trunked domes (those on the ground) rather accessible route would be unobstructed if there were no out of compliance projections, slots, ramps or stairs on the path of travel.
 
Yes, truncated domes can be within the path of travel.

They are not an obstruction, they are a warning to a hazard.

You want them in the POT.

IMG_1707.jpg
 
Tactile Warning Devices are only used when a accessible route crosses a vehicular path. Meaning that they're not required at the base of a ramp to a van accessible aisle.

Bill
 
KZQuixote said:
Tactile Warning Devices are only used when a accessible route crosses a vehicular path. Meaning that they're not required at the base of a ramp to a van accessible aisle. Bill
Bill

In CA, see original post, That is not true
 
mark handler said:
Yes, truncated domes can be within the path of travel. They are not an obstruction, they are a warning to a hazard.

You want them in the POT.

IMG_1707.jpg
So, in the photo example, if there is a curb at each end of the area covered in truncated domes and the distance between the curbs is say 1000 feet, is the entire area is considered a curb rank, specifically to California accessibility requirements and therefore must be covered in truncated domes?
 
FWIW--I'm not entirely sure, but...I was told the 2010 (now in effect) ADAAG has changed to only require domes at roadways, i.e. crosswalks on the road.

The 1000' example would not be required, and In-n-Out burger could get rid of all those mats

mj
 
I would agree, except California has different requirements for curb ramps. The code language says that truncated domes are required at curb ramps for the full width and depth of the curb ramp. If the ramp is over 1000 feet, as it is on a project I'm working on, we may be looking at putting in over 1000 feet of truncated domes.
 
= =

Codegeek,

Does the Cal. requirement also state the truncated domes

must be installed over the entire length of the ramp, or

just at the transition point from grade to the ramp itself?

IMO, it sounds as though just the transition point is

where the domes would be required......In the photo posted

above, the area of the installed yellow domes is the point

of transition.

$ $
 
north star said:
= =Codegeek,

Does the Cal. requirement also state the truncated domes

must be installed over the entire length of the ramp, or

just at the transition point from grade to the ramp itself?

IMO, it sounds as though just the transition point is

where the domes would be required......In the photo posted

above, the area of the installed yellow domes is the point

of transition.

$ $
That's what I'm trying to find out.
 
In Cal and you have a curb ramp the TDs must be installed on the entire length and width of the ramp (not on the flares if you have them). If it's not a curb ramp they are required to be the full width x 36" deep at the transition to a hazardous area/drive aisle along the accessible path of travel.
 
MtnArch said:
In Cal and you have a curb ramp the TDs must be installed on the entire length and width of the ramp (not on the flares if you have them). If it's not a curb ramp they are required to be the full width x 36" deep at the transition to a hazardous area/drive aisle along the accessible path of travel.
So, referring to the photo with the yellow truncated domes, if the curb ramp is 1,000 feet in length, then the entire 1,000 feet must have truncated domes? Why wouldn't the 1,000 feet be a transition area? It just seems overkill to put in 1,000 feet of truncated domes in when the curb is over 1,000 feet apart.
 
Codegeek said:
That's what I'm trying to find out.
CA does require entire "curb ramp" to be covered, But in PROW areas, not covered by the building code, most municipalities rely on Federal Hwy standards that just have the lower three feet w/DW

Curb ramp

On Private property full width full depth

Public property 3 feet at bottom of ramp

Pedestrian ramps

DW not required

Hazardous transitions, as in the In and Out picture above, 3 feet
 
mark handler said:
CA does require entire "curb ramp" to be covered, But in PROW areas, not covered by the building code, most municipalities rely on Federal Hwy standards that just have the lower three feet w/DWCurb ramp

On Private property full width full depth

Public property 3 feet at bottom of ramp

Pedestrian ramps

DW not required

Hazardous transitions, as in the In and Out picture above, 3 feet
It looks like there is a curb ramp towards the back of the transition by the drive-thru.

What I'm dealing with is a retail store with a transition area that measures over 1,000 feet in length. At each end of the transition is a curb. So, is this a transition or a curb ramp?
 
Codegeek said:
It looks like there is a curb ramp towards the back of the transition by the drive-thru. What I'm dealing with is a retail store with a transition area that measures over 1,000 feet in length. At each end of the transition is a curb. So, is this a transition or a curb ramp?
If there is a curb ramp towards the back, it should be full width and depth

Is it a ramp or a transition is a curb?

A ramp is clearly defined in the CBC.

A zero curb face "transition", requires the entire length to have DW three feet wide

DSCN0213-costco.jpg
 
It's not a ramp. The elevation is the same throughout the transition area and the parking lot as well as the entrance into the store. I'd post an image, but all I have is a pdf file and I don't have the software to convert it to a jpeg, gif or png.
 
mark handler said:
This is not rocket science or brain surgery
I understand that. The photo didn't come through in the post when I read it first and responded. Now I see what you're saying. Thanks for your help Mark.
 
The whole purpose of truncated domes is to keep the blind from walking from a pedestrian way into traffic, a reflecting pond or onto the rails without warning. Where the sidewalk is flush with the pavement it is needed the whole way. They are not considered an obstruction.

That said they can give wheelchair users and especially the frail using walkers some difficulties

.
 
Back
Top