• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Existing Public Library ADA?

steveray

SAWHORSE
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
11,751
Location
West of the river CT
We have an existing "historic" Town Library building that I am asked what it needs to comply with ADA...all stairs, all small bathrooms, not a hint of accessibility anywhere that I know of......? No remodeling planed, but dealing with budget and trying to put numbers into a capitol improvement plan,,,

Without having Mark or one of the experts "do my work for me"...links, guidance, references appreciated.....Thanks!
 
It all depends on how far they want to go. If they want to be fully compliant just pull up the ADA requirements for a new building in the local applicable codes. I would think at the very least you would need ramps so somebody could get into the building, accessible restrooms and an elevator for access to the complete building if it's multistory. Of course, the applicable number of handicap parking spaces would definitely be Req and the easiest to accomplish.
 
Assuming this is just about making the existing building compliant, and your question is not related to some other addition / alteration to the facility,
and assuming that "historic" means it's a registered historic property, then here's the ADA advisory:

Advisory 202.5 Alterations to Qualified Historic Buildings and Facilities Exception. State Historic Preservation Officers are State appointed officials who carry out certain responsibilities under the National Historic Preservation Act. State Historic Preservation Officers consult with Federal and State agencies, local governments, and private entities on providing access and protecting significant elements of qualified historic buildings and facilities.

There are exceptions for alterations to qualified historic buildings and facilities for accessible routes (206.2.1 Exception 1 and 206.2.3 Exception 7); entrances (206.4 Exception 2); and toilet facilities (213.2 Exception 2). When an entity believes that compliance with the requirements for any of these elements would threaten or destroy the historic significance of the building or facility, the entity should consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer. If the State Historic Preservation Officer agrees that compliance with the requirements for a specific element would threaten or destroy the historic significance of the building or facility, use of the exception is permitted.

Public entities have an additional obligation to achieve program accessibility under the Department of Justice ADA regulations. See 28 CFR 35.150. These regulations require public entities that operate historic preservation programs to give priority to methods that provide physical access to individuals with disabilities. If alterations to a qualified historic building or facility to achieve program accessibility would threaten or destroy the historic significance of the building or facility, fundamentally alter the program, or result in undue financial or administrative burdens, the Department of Justice ADA regulations allow alternative methods to be used to achieve program accessibility.

In the case of historic preservation programs, such as an historic house museum, alternative methods include using audio-visual materials to depict portions of the house that cannot otherwise be made accessible. In the case of other qualified historic properties, such as an historic government office building, alternative methods include relocating programs and services to accessible locations. The Department of Justice ADA regulations also allow public entities to use alternative methods when altering qualified historic buildings or facilities in the rare situations where the State Historic Preservation Officer determines that it is not feasible to provide physical access using the exceptions permitted in Section 202.5 without threatening or destroying the historic significance of the building or facility. See 28 CFR 35.151(d).

The AccessAbility Office at the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) provides a variety of resources for museum operators and historic properties including: the Design for Accessibility Guide and the Disability Symbols. Contact NEA about these and other resources at (202) 682‒5532 or www.arts.gov.
 
Thanks all...did some digging and sent it to our facilities folks and informed them as it is enforced by lawsuit to contact corp council to see what they think might get us sued and asked if there was any unique programming at that branch that was not available elsewhere and that answer was no....
 
We have an existing "historic" Town Library building that I am asked what it needs to comply with ADA...all stairs, all small bathrooms, not a hint of accessibility anywhere that I know of......? No remodeling planed, but dealing with budget and trying to put numbers into a capitol improvement plan,,,

Without having Mark or one of the experts "do my work for me"...links, guidance, references appreciated.....Thanks!
If this building is historic, it may be exempt under the ADA. Please refer to ADA 36.405 Alterations: Historic Preservation and 202.5. If the building is registered under the National Register of Historic Places you may not allowed to destroy the historic parts of the building.
 
If this building is historic, it may be exempt under the ADA. Please refer to ADA 36.405 Alterations: Historic Preservation and 202.5. If the building is registered under the National Register of Historic Places you may not allowed to destroy the historic parts of the building.
Revisiting this - - I understand your intent - - but, instead of saying it is "exempt from ADA", it's perhaps more technically accurate to say it "complies with ADA to the maximum extent feasible for this historic property".
Both phrases may end up describing the exact same physical condition, but I prefer the latter because implies that ADA was carefully considered vs. historic character-defining elements, and the preserved existing conditions are the end result of that full consideration.

In a similar manner, when I am altering existing apartments built prior to 1991, I don't say "it doesn't need to comply with FHA". Instead, I say something like: "the project is in full compliance with FHA as it applies to existing apartments first occupied prior to 3/13/1991". It just seems to smooth out future controversies on access compliance.
 
Top