• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Fire suppression system kills eight people

mtlogcabin

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 17, 2009
Messages
10,150
Location
Big Sky Country
BANGKOK — Eight people died and seven others were injured when workers accidentally released fire extinguishing chemicals into the basement of one of Thailand's largest banks.

The accident occurred Sunday night during an upgrade of the safety system at Siam Commercial Bank's headquarters in Bangkok, officials said Monday.




Caution

Graphic Content

Click to reveal





IMAGE: EPA



Workers activated a system that mistakenly released Pyrogen aerosol, a chemical fire retardant which is normally intended to deprive fire of oxygen, the statement said.

The bank said in a statement that an initial investigation found that the accident was caused by "negligence on the part of our contractors hired to improve fire protection in the building."



The bank identified those who died as a security guard and seven contractors.

Bangkok's Erawan medical emergency center said five people died at the site of the accident and three died later at a hospital.




Caution

Graphic Content

Click to reveal





IMAGE: EPA






Caution

Graphic Content

Click to reveal





IMAGE: EPA



It said that the apparent cause of death was suffocation from insufficient oxygen, but that the official cause would not be known until autopsies are performed.

Seven other people suffered suffocation-related injuries, including four who were in serious condition, Erawan said.

Police were still investigating the accident and the bank said it would release more information after a meeting of its board members Monday.
 
I would logically assume that the fail safe measures were not in place and wonder if this agent is 2001 compliant.......hummmm
What I saw when I was there was that failsafe measures on systems like this were nonexistent in most cases and of course their regulations are completely different so there's no flexing as being 2001 compliant. If there was I'm sure the systems I saw wouldn't have the requirements.

I was actually at the facilities of a major international corporation that I worked for so it's not as if I was visiting facilities of a Third World company.
 
Back
Top