• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

German Architect gets One Year for death of fire fighter

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,678
Location
So. CA
y Paresh DaveJanuary 3, 2014,*11:09 a.m.A German architect accused of recklessly installing a fireplace in his Hollywood Hills mansion, leading to a firefighter’s death in February 2011, is expected to serve about six months in jail after pleading no contest Friday to involuntary manslaughter.Gerhard Becker, 49, was sentenced to one year in jail as a condition of his probation, but will probably spend only about half of that behind bars due to time already served and other factors.*Prosecutors had sought four years in jail."The problem with probation in this case is that it sends a message you can blame somebody else and escape," Deputy Dist. Atty. Sean Carney said outside the courtroom.Prosecutors allege Becker told a city building inspector that he didn’t plan to build any fireplaces in his three-story, 12,000-square-foot hillside house. But authorities say he did so anyway after the final inspection in November 2010.Days after Becker was permitted to move in, a fire awoke him and his girlfriend at night. Authorities determined after the fire that Becker had built long fire pits meant for outdoor use into his home.Firefighter Glenn Allen died fighting the blaze.Relatives Allen and nearly 200 other people had sent letters to Los Angeles County Superior Judge Robert Perry*urging him to order the maximum sentence.“We want to send a message, 'Build stuff right and don’t cut corners,'" said Frank Lima, president of the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City union.Becker was*accused of gross negligence for building the frame of the fireplaces with combustible materials, instead of materials such as brick, and for not building any firebreaks inside the walls.The fire had rocketed up to the attic. The ceiling eventually collapsed, crushing three firefighters, including Allen, who later died at a hospital due to lack of oxygen to his brain while he was pinned down.At Friday's hearing, the judge struggled with deciding how much responsibility to place on Becker's shoulders after he said in court that city inspectors should have done a better job of following up on the house.Becker later the sold the house for $7.55 million and used proceeds from the sale to post $2 million bail. But he surrendered to authorities nearly three weeks ago in anticipation of the sentencing.Becker*also expects to be deported to Europe upon being released because he's in the U.S. on an expired visa, his attorney said in court.http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-german-architect-sentenced-20140103,0,4315131.story#ixzz2pNpRDSmw
 
What a dick.

Special place in hell and all that. And I don't even believe in hell.

Guess it's not just the hillbillies that pull bonkers like that.

Of all people he should have known better.

Brent.
 
Judge placed a large amount of the blame on the building and safety inspector s for not inspecting the renovation properly
 
ICE said:
The architect didn't kill the fireman, the fire did.
The architect intentionally violated the building and fire codes . thus causing the fire. The person who violates the code/law is by our laws/statutes is responsible.

It's like saying the drunk driver did not kill the child the crash did.

The architect chose to violate the codes.
 
LA TIMES

The manslaughter case against architect Gerhard Becker was novel from the start.Los Angeles prosecutors charged that Becker built a Hollywood Hills West mansion with such disregard for public safety and building codes that he should be held criminally liable for the death of a Los Angeles firefighter who was crushed by a thousand pounds of ceiling while battling a blaze there in 2011.Becker, 49, was set to go on trial for involuntary manslaughter and faced up to four years in jail. But on Friday, the case came to an abrupt end with a judge agreeing to a deal that will keep the architect in jail for a total of only six months in exchange for a no-contest plea.Prosecutors, the victim’s family and firefighters opposed the resolution, saying Becker deserved more punishment. About 15 uniformed firefighters attended the court hearing Friday to lend their support. More than 400 firefighters submitted letters to the court.In offering the deal, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Robert Perry questioned the strength of the prosecution’s case. He suggested that a Los Angeles building and safety inspector who reviewed Becker’s home may share some of the blame.The inspector, Brad Bescos, signed off on the house three months before the fire, according to court records. During an interview with investigators and then in his testimony at a preliminary hearing in 2012, Bescos offered conflicting accounts about whether he saw some of the building code violations or whether Becker might have hidden them during an inspection. The confusion damaged the inspector’s credibility in the eyes of the judge.“There are serious issues of proof for responsibility of the loss of life,” Perry said.Deputy Dist. Atty. Sean Carney, who had offered Becker a plea deal of two years in jail, criticized the judge’s offer Friday, saying it missed an opportunity to send a stronger message to architects who might be considering skirting the rules.“It is a sentence that undermines any deterrent effect — that says they can blame it on city bureaucracy’s negligence,” Carney said outside the courtroom, flanked by firefighters.“I don’t think six months in jail is worth what all these guys went through,” retired firefighter Kevin Mulvehill tearfully told reporters. “Everyone who responded has a life sentence.”After11years of designing massive villas on a Spanish island, Becker had set his sights on a new challenge: a lot on Viewsite Terrace straddling a hillside a mile up from West Hollywood’s ritzy Sunset Plaza.He bought the land for $905,000 in 2009, then began designing and overseeing the $4-million construction of what was to be his 12,000-square-foot home. The German national was not licensed by the California Architects Board.The living room, kitchen, garage and deck would sit at street level and two other floors would drop behind the cliff, offering unfettered views of the Los Angeles Basin.An infinity pool, floor-to-ceiling windows, a maid’s room, nine bathrooms and six bedrooms were built on the palm-tree-lined property. The producers of a German reality TV show hosted by Heidi Klum paid $100,000 to use the home for two months.Disregarding the manufacturer’s safety warnings in favor of aesthetics, Becker placed a long, natural-gas fire trough into a recessed wall of the mansion’s living room, prosecutors alleged.The pebble-filled fire pit came with a notice that it could lead to loss of life if installed anywhere but outdoors. It sat along an alcove that was 15 feet long, 18 inches high and 18 inches above the floor. Flames rose just two inches shy of the top. It had been turned on the night of the fire, but authorities couldn’t determine if it had been turned off before the ignition box below led to the larger blaze.Becker surrounded the fireplace — and three others in the house like it — with wood and drywall instead of non-flammable materials. Each unit with installation cost $6,000, according to court files. If done properly, authorities said, the price would have been 10 times more.“No reasonable person would build a fireplace out of wood, because what happens is the obvious result, the wood catches fire,” Carney said.A vent that should have been angled upward was flat and just 4 inches wide, prosecutors said. And without any fire-stop materials inside the walls to impede the flames, the fire surged to the attic.The ceiling collapsed about 45 minutes after the 911 call. A firefighter said in court he had never seen anything like it. If built to code, the attic should have been free of flames for at least the first hour, authorities said.“What we rely on as a community is the good faith of the persons who are actually responsible for the construction,” Carney said during a preliminary hearing. “What he [becker] put forward was contempt and arrogance for any safety standards he didn’t agree with.”Glenn Allen, a 61-year-old with nearly 37 years of service in the Los Angeles Fire Department, died two days after being pulled from the rubble. He missed the birth of his first grandchild by a day. His wife, Melanie, said Friday that her daughter’s two sons have missed out on learning how to use Allen’s fire tools.“My life has been ripped to shreds,” she said.Carney told the court that Becker would lug around the building code book, nit-picking with contractors, inspectors and even their bosses to ensure every detail worked out his way. He pulled out fire sprinklers, a pool alarm and staircase railings after inspections, prosecutors alleged.“The defendant flagrantly didn’t care as long as he got his way, whether or not building and safety approved it, because that was the way he was apparently used to in Europe,” Carney said Friday as he tried to persuade the judge to offer a harsher sentence. He told the judge that any fault placed on the city inspector should not detract from Becker’s callous code violations.Becker’s attorney, Donald Re, argued that Becker never would have moved in if he had felt unsafe. In a civil lawsuit filed by Melanie Allen, Re said Becker reached a “substantial” settlement to transfer his insurance reimbursement to her family.“There will be no winner in this case, but this will be on his soul forever,” Re said.Judge Perry called the insurance settlement deal a sign of remorse. He speculated that the city inspector shouldn’t have missed Becker’s violations and worried about the possibility of a hung jury if the case went to trial.He previously signaled he would offer a one-year plea deal, and Becker surrendered to authorities the week before Christmas. With time already served and other factors, he’s likely to be released from jail by May. Because his visa has expired, he will be deported to Europe after his release.Becker cried Friday when his attorney talked about how he would finally be able to return to his fiance, daughter and ailing father.Allen was the 61st city firefighter to have died in the line of duty in the department’s125 years.Legal experts said criminal prosecution, let alone conviction, in a case of shoddy design and construction is rare despite the thousands of injuries each year that might be traced to builders cutting corners.“With this plea, there will be greater pressure on prosecutors to charge the architect,” said Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor. “Tragedies are often followed by demands for prosecution and those demands are likely to be tied to this case as precedent.”paresh.dave@latimes.com*Times staff writer Andrew Khouri contributed to this report
 
chris kennedy said:
Holy crap, that's not only negligent it's just plain stupid.
Yet he only got a year for involuntary manslaughter, with credit for time served.

He will also be deported, and cannot return to the US
 
As wrong as the construction was, the fireman died because he or his superiors made a mistake. That is the case every time a a fireman dies. It is a high risk occupation and mistakes can be fatal.

The architect built against code. That was his mistake.

The ceiling didn't collapse as a result of a code violation. The ceiling collapsed as the result of the fire.

The fireman went into the wrong burning building. That was the fireman's mistake. I don't mean to be callus towards the fireman but the risk is well known.

Had the fire been caused by a nail in a wire, would the electrician go to jail?

How about a housewife who's a lousy cook and starts a kitchen fire? Her negligence caused the fire. If a fireman falls through the roof would you think that it's her fault or would you agree that the fireman shouldn't have been on that roof?

Add a meth lab and the cook goes to jail for the mistake made by the fireman.

Since it is negligence in most cases: BBQ got out of hand, open can of paint thinner left in the garage, faulty car repair, smoking in bed....well the smoker is DOA so he ain't going to jail. How are these negligent folks punished by the authorities?

It's like saying the drunk driver did not kill the child the crash did.
How about a fireman that gets run over while at the scene. Is the drunk driver culpable in that death?

What about the fireman's wife that was robbed at knife point while walking the family dog? As it happened, the fireman went home that day but he was late because of the last call of the day...the drunk driver. Although thankful for the overtime, he missed his chore of walking the dog and Daisy had to pee. Is the drunk driver the proximate cause of events after the crash?

I remember a case some years ago. A man stole appliances from a construction site. Forty miles from the scene of the crime, on his way home, a stove fell from his pickup into traffic on the 91 freeway. An off duty deputy hit the stove and was killed. The thief was charged with murder because the incident happened during the commission of a crime.

How much did the deputy's driving ability weigh in that decision? Was he following too close....daydreaming...after all, he slammed into a stove.

I wonder what the insurance company that paid Becker is thinking now that Becker has been convicted of a crime. The court has determined that Becker caused the fire as the result of committing a crime. So if you burn your house down, do you still deserve an insurance payout?

The pebble-filled fire pit came with a notice that it could lead to loss of life if installed anywhere but outdoors.
Was that because of the products of combustion?

How does the building dept. figure into this? I haven't heard what was done wrong by the inspector(s).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ICE said:
As wrong as the construction was, the fireman died because he or his superiors made a mistake. That is the case every time a a fireman dies. It is a high risk occupation and mistakes can be fatal. The architect built against code. That was his mistake.

The ceiling didn't collapse as a result of a code violation. The ceiling collapsed as the result of the fire.

The fireman went into the wrong burning building. That was the fireman's mistake. I don't mean to be callus towards the fireman but the risk is well known.

Had the fire been caused by a nail in a wire, would the electrician go to jail?

How about a housewife who's a lousy cook and starts a kitchen fire? Her negligence caused the fire. If a fireman falls through the roof would you think that it's her fault or would you agree that the fireman shouldn't have been on that roof.

Add a meth lab and the cook goes to jail for the mistake made by the fireman.

Since it is negligence in most cases: bbq got out of hand, open can of paint thinner left in the garage, faulty car repair, smoking in bed....well the smoker is DOA so he ain't going to jail. How are these negligent folks punished by the authorities?

How about a fireman that gets run over while at the scene. Is the drunk driver culpable in that death?

What about the fireman's wife that was robbed at knife point while walking the family dog? As it happened, the fireman went home that day but he was late because of the last call of the day...the drunk driver. Although thankful for the overtime, he missed his chore of walking the dog and Daisy had to pee. Is the drunk driver the proximate cause of events after the crash?

I remember a case some years ago. A man stole appliances from a construction site. Forty miles from the scene of the crime, on his way home, a stove fell from his pickup into traffic on the 91 freeway. An off duty deputy hit the stove and was killed. The thief was charged with murder because the incident happened during the commission of a crime.

How much did the deputy's driving ability weigh in that decision? Was he following too close....daydreaming...after all, he slammed into a stove.

I wonder what the insurance company that paid Becker is thinking now that Becker has been convicted of a crime. The court has determined that Becker caused the fire as the result of committing a crime. So if you burn your house down, do you still deserve an insurance payout?
You can make excuses, for negligence and deliberately violating the code and laws.

As You can blame any victim of a crime. The store owner should not have built his store there. The child should not have been in His/Her parents car. A rape victim should not have been at the bar.......

It does not absolve the person of the homicide

I guess we will need to blame the building inspectors when they fall through the roof when the contractor failed to replace the rotten sheathing... it was the inspectors fault... the building inspectors should have known the contractor covered the rotten sheathing.

And just so you know, the collapse was because of water build up in the joist bays. the water was from the sprinkler system, held in place by the visqueen vapor barrier....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mark handler said:
You can make excuses, for negligence and deliberately violating the code and laws.As You can blame any victim of a crime. The store owner should not have built his store there. The child should not have been in His/Her parents car. A rape victim should not have been at the bar.......

It does not absolve the person of the homicide
I am not making excuses. I am not advocating one way or another. I am pointing out facts. Your statements take the premise to the extreme.
 
conarb said:
But the building inspectors go completely unpunished.
According to TV news reports, The fireplaces were added after the Building was finaled by the Building Department, This was from the fire department spokesman....

The judge said the Building department , should have known.....
 
ICE said:
As wrong as the construction was, the fireman died because he or his superiors made a mistake. That is the case every time a a fireman dies. It is a high risk occupation and mistakes can be fatal. The architect built against code. That was his mistake.

The ceiling didn't collapse as a result of a code violation. The ceiling collapsed as the result of the fire.

The fireman went into the wrong burning building. That was the fireman's mistake. I don't mean to be callus towards the fireman but the risk is well known.

Had the fire been caused by a nail in a wire, would the electrician go to jail?

Yes, we would if the wearing wasn't installed to code or if he didn't install the proper protection for the wiring.

How about a housewife who's a lousy cook and starts a kitchen fire? Her negligence caused the fire. If a fireman falls through the roof would you think that it's her fault or would you agree that the fireman shouldn't have been on that roof.

No, being a lousy cook is not against code.

Add a meth lab and the cook goes to jail for the mistake made by the fireman.

As the cook should because the fire in this case was caused by something illegal.

Since it is negligence in most cases: bbq got out of hand, open can of paint thinner left in the garage, faulty car repair, smoking in bed....well the smoker is DOA so he ain't going to jail. How are these negligent folks punished by the authorities?

How about a fireman that gets run over while at the scene. Is the drunk driver culpable in that death?

Yes, because he was driving drunk same thing would have happened if he had hit a pedestrian or another driver.

What about the fireman's wife that was robbed at knife point while walking the family dog? As it happened, the fireman went home that day but he was late because of the last call of the day...the drunk driver. Although thankful for the overtime, he missed his chore of walking the dog and Daisy had to pee. Is the drunk driver the proximate cause of events after the crash?

I remember a case some years ago. A man stole appliances from a construction site. Forty miles from the scene of the crime, on his way home, a stove fell from his pickup into traffic on the 91 freeway. An off duty deputy hit the stove and was killed. The thief was charged with murder because the incident happened during the commission of a crime.

How much did the deputy's driving ability weigh in that decision? Was he following too close....daydreaming...after all, he slammed into a stove.

I wonder what the insurance company that paid Becker is thinking now that Becker has been convicted of a crime. The court has determined that Becker caused the fire as the result of committing a crime. So if you burn your house down, do you still deserve an insurance payout?
He obviously shouldn't and probably won't get the insurance payment. If you intentionally burned down a building through arson you don't get the insurance payment either.

I provided answers to some of your totally off-the-wall questions earlier in your post. If you committed a crime or violated a code and as a result of that a firefighter or anyone else dies you can and will be held responsible! It's that simple. There have even been cases where command officers in the fire service has been held liable because their actions were not assisted with standard procedures and caused the death of other firefighters. In the cases you cited firefighters were following normal procedures and were killed because of extenuating circumstances caused by code or criminal violations.
 
Msradell said:
He obviously shouldn't and probably won't get the insurance payment. If you intentionally burned down a building through arson you don't get the insurance payment either.I provided answers to some of your totally off-the-wall questions earlier in your post. If you committed a crime or violated a code and as a result of that a firefighter or anyone else dies you can and will be held responsible! It's that simple. There have even been cases where command officers in the fire service has been held liable because their actions were not assisted with standard procedures and caused the death of other firefighters. In the cases you cited firefighters were following normal procedures and were killed because of extenuating circumstances caused by code or criminal violations.
He already got the insurance money.

Normal procedures let them down.

So Ma'am, what did you think about Daisy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My guess based on doing a lot of buisness with LA City Building Department, they are very through

one of several scenarios, LA City Building Department do check the model numbers, and at the time of inspection:

1) the architect may have said they were not going to install it at this time and will get a permit later

OR

2) the architect may have installed the unit that was on the plans and changed it out after final
 
Msradell said:
He obviously shouldn't and probably won't get the insurance payment. If you intentionally burned down a building through arson you don't get the insurance payment either.
A homeowners' policy not only covers fire damages but all kinds of other liability, in fact a few years ago I considered not renewing my homeowners' insurance but couldn't live without the other personal liability coverage. Becker's insurance probably paid for his negligence in installing the fire feature.

Mark said:
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Robert Perry questioned the strength of the prosecution’s case. He suggested that a Los Angeles building and safety inspector who reviewed Becker’s home may share some of the blame.
The judge wasn't completely convinced that the building department wasn't at partially to blame, that's why the settlement was made to avoid a long expensive prosecution attempting to apportion liability. As opposed to most other states California has "Comparative Liability", so even a 1% tortfeasor may end up paying the bulk of the damages. An old friend actually made published case law on this issue. He and his girlfriend were drinking in a bar in the gold country, he was quite drunk, she was somewhat less drunk, she drove him home in her car, she went through a road barricade on a curve on a winding road and he was severely injured with millions of dollars in medical damages, the jury found she was something like 92% at fault for being drunk and the county was 8% at fault in it's maintenance of the barricade, her insurance was the minimum $25,000, under comparative liability her insurance paid the maximum $25,000 without argument, the remaining millions in damages were paid by the County's insurance company under comparative liability.

In Becker's case, if the damaged litigants were able to prove any liability on the part of the building department, then the litigants would get a shot at any awarded damages in excess of Becker's insurance and personal assets. Sovereign immunity is breaking down as it should.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mark handler said:
And just so you know, the collapse was because of water build up in the joist bays. the water was from the sprinkler system, held in place by the visqueen vapor barrier....
Around here, the fire dept. inspects sprinklers not the building dept.
 
ICE said:
Around here, the fire dept. inspects sprinklers not the building dept.
The fire department spokesperson was supporting, not slamming the Building department.
 
mark handler said:
The judge said the Building department , should have known.....
That's sorta like what I do when I dial a wrong number. When the person says that I dialed the wrong number I say, "No, you picked up the wrong phone".
 
ICE said:
That's sorta like what I do when I dial a wrong number. When the person says that I dialed the wrong number I say, "No, you picked up the wrong phone".
I think you need a nap
 
I edited my post above adding an explanation of California's Comparative Liability which explains why the DA didn't pursue the case further against Becker, I'm reposting it here since some would not have seen it.

Mark said:
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Robert Perry questioned the strength of the prosecution’s case. He suggested that a Los Angeles building and safety inspector who reviewed Becker’s home may share some of the blame.
The judge wasn't completely convinced that the building department wasn't at least partially to blame, that's why the settlement was made to avoid a long expensive prosecution attempting to apportion liability. As opposed to most other states California has "Comparative Liability", so even a 1% tortfeasor may end up paying the bulk of the damages. An old friend actually made published case law on this issue. He and his girlfriend were drinking in a bar in the gold country, he was quite drunk, she was somewhat less drunk, she drove him home in her car, she went through a road barricade on a curve on a winding road and he was severely injured with millions of dollars in medical damages, the jury found she was something like 92% at fault for being drunk and the county was 8% at fault in it's maintenance of the barricade, her insurance was the minimum $25,000, under comparative liability her insurance paid the maximum $25,000 without argument, the remaining millions in damages were paid by the County's insurance company under comparative liability.

In Becker's case, if the damaged litigants were able to prove any liability on the part of the building department, then the litigants would get a shot at any awarded damages in excess of Becker's insurance and personal assets. Sovereign immunity is breaking down as it should, and getting to the deep pockets is the name of the game in law.

California went to comparative liability in the early 70s, as I recall there are only a couple of other states that have adopted it.
 
Insurance companies normally are not responsible when the homeowner is knowing negligent.

He knew the fireplaces we not approved for interior use.

He may not get any money, and if he does, his lawyer will probably get it....
 
Top