• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Reclassifying from Commercial to Residential

artbuc

REGISTERED
Joined
Mar 24, 2022
Messages
32
Location
Chester County, PA
Our HOA has two clubhouses. The main clubhouse is larger, about 5000sf, and the other is smaller, maybe 3000 sf. For some reason, the main clubhouse is Commercial with a dry sprinkler system and the smaller clubhouse does not have a sprinkler system so I assume it is Residential.

Is it possible to reclassify our main clubhouse from Commercial to Residential? How do I get started…should I contact our township building inspector? Thanks.
 
Commercial or residential has limited bearing on the fire sprinkler system. Building size, construction type, use group and number of potential occupants does. if the goal is to remove the sprinkler system, that is a doubtful endeavor, most fire and building officials through the code compliance process will not allow the lessening of protection in a building.
 
Last edited:
Information is lacking, but I would say if the buildings are not used as dwelling or sleeping units they are not "residential", whether sprinklered or not. Additionally, the identification of something as residential or commercial can be misleading when it comes to building and fire codes. Most codes have two distinct codes used in the design of buildings. I am being generic here to avoid getting too far into the weeds, but one is for a limited set of structures used for single or two-family dwellings. The other is for everything else. They are commonly referred to as "residential" or "commercial", but that isn't really a fair description. A building can be "residential", but designed out of the "commercial" code. I think the reason one is suppressed and the other is not is more a function of size, use and occupant load. I would hazard a guess that the small un-sprinkled building is a "commercial" building. I don't know why you would want to "reclassify" them but unless drastic changes in use are planned, they could not be converted, and would likely provide little benefit even if they could.
 
As with so many answers on this forum a lot depends first on what codes are adopted in your jurisdiction, and second, how your AHJ interprets those codes.

The "residential code" is kind of a more specific subset of the "building code." Sifu's response is excellent. "...identification of something as residential or commercial can be misleading when it comes to building and fire codes."

When you identify what codes are adopted for your location, then look to the scope and applicability sections. For example the residential code in my jurisdiction says:

R101.2 Scope

The provisions of this code shall apply to the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, removal and demolition of detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses not more than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate means of egress and their accessory structures not more than three stories above grade plane in height.

Then you would need to find out if your AHJ (Building Official, Commissioner, Inspector, etc.) is willing to consider the building in question to be accessory to a dwelling that qualifies for the residential code. Based on your description I think that is very unlikely.

To get better answers here please provide more information. Specifically, why do you want to reclassify this building?
 
Anyone else thinking that the OP may be asking about zoning regulations and how the lot it zoned? Perhaps a commercial vs. residential zoning designation.
 
I just saw that the OP had another thread going about sprinkler heads. I'm betting they want to look for a way to avoid some requirement or another...
 
Back
Top