• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Still Trying to Figure This Out

In the design, does the tie beam need to be lowered and connected to the lintel over the openings? It appears that the smaller opening to the left has a similar condition. That said, it is odd to see what appears to be a tie beam at the left, further back wall, but no tie beam is evident in the wall at the front. Then, there is a tie beam mid-height of the wall seen through the doorway.

Given the irregularity of the tie beam placement/elevations, I am speculating that the floor levels may be offset and the location of the tie beams may correspond to imbed plates or some other condition we cannot derive from this photo.

I will say, overall, this photo is initially concerning. That said, we do not have the engineering design to know that this is wrong either. If a tie beam is necessary for an imbed or some other reason, then one would think the tie beam would be at minimum the same length as the lintel; however, in this case, the concrete element does not extend much past the width of the opening.
 
Back
Top