We have a slab on grade addition that is not complying with the current code regarding wood framing members being a min. of 8" to the grade (CBC2304.11.2.2, similar to IBC but California has to feel special I guess). There is an existing sloping slab that was cut to accommodate the monolithic slab/footing and the distance is about 4-5". The addition is getting a stucco finish and the bottom of the weep screed will be about 2" off of the flatwork, which slopes away from the addition with no ponding issues.
Is there a provision in the code that will allow for small deviations from the code when the intent of the code is being complied with and to comply with the code will impose a financial hardship on the parties involved? Any suggestions on how to deal with this situation are appreciated.
Rio
P.S. I noticed the exception with allowing the bottom of the sill to be 6" from the top of asphalt or concrete draining away from the building but we are coming in at 4-5" regarding that situation.
Is there a provision in the code that will allow for small deviations from the code when the intent of the code is being complied with and to comply with the code will impose a financial hardship on the parties involved? Any suggestions on how to deal with this situation are appreciated.
Rio
P.S. I noticed the exception with allowing the bottom of the sill to be 6" from the top of asphalt or concrete draining away from the building but we are coming in at 4-5" regarding that situation.
Last edited by a moderator: