​Rep. McNerney Announces ADA Compliance Legislation

[mark handler]

Rep. McNerney Announces ADA Compliance Legislation

http://eastcountytoday.net/rep-mcner...e-legislation/

Bill Aims to ***** ADA Compliance through Notification to Improve Access for All Patrons

Stockton, CA Standing with small business advocates and community leaders, Congressman Jerry McNerney (CA-09) announced new legislation to promote greater compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Acts (ADA) accessibility standards within the business community. ADA accessibility compliance lawsuits have hit the Stockton area particularly hard, with some businesses forced to shut down, relocate, or payout large settlements. New York, Alabama, Florida, and Pennsylvania are among other states also affected by ADA-related lawsuit abuse.

The COMPLI (Correcting Obstructions to Mediate, Prevent, and Limit Inaccessibility) Act, H.R.4719, focuses on increasing ADA accessibility compliance among businesses to prevent predatory lawsuits from high-frequency litigants that hurt small businesses while not always bringing resolution the accessibility issue.

I have heard from numerous local businesses who were forced to shut down, lay off employees, pay out large settlements, or change locations because of repeated lawsuits and threats of lawsuits that leave these businesses with little to no financial resources or time to fix the problem and become compliant, said Rep. McNerney. My COMPLI Act would give businesses a 90-day period after notification of a potential infraction to correct the access barrier. Increasing ADA compliance among the business community is good for the local economy, and it is something we can achieve while at the same time ensuring that aggrieved individuals are still able to bring lawsuits against businesses for ADA infractions. The ADA gives equal rights and access to individuals with disabilities, and I want to make sure everyone has equal access to enjoy the businesses within our communities.

The COMPLI Act will require a potential plaintiff or aggrieved individual to provide written notice to the owner of the business, by certified mail, which identifies the specific ADA violation and the date and time the individual experienced the barrier.

Some of the most common ADA infractions include: not having enough accessible parking spaces; having non-compliant or missing parking signs; and issues related to loading zones and van accessible aisles.

Rep. McNerneys legislation provides the business owner 90 days from the date of notification that a barrier exists to correct the barrier, before any lawsuit or demand letter can be issued. A business owner may qualify for an additional 30 day extension if he or she attempts in good faith to remedy an access barrier but is unsuccessful within the original 90 day compliance period.

Good faith can be determined if the business owner has: secured the appropriate construction permits and hired contractors to complete construction; or has begun construction and has worked to minimize delays in completion.

The business owner must also notify its customers of the ADA violation while it is in the process of correcting the barrier. Businesses must provide this notification to customers within 15 days after receipt of an ADA violation notice.

The California Commission on Disability Access (CCDA) found that 54 percent of all ADA accessibility claims filed in California came from just two law firms, and 46 percent of those claims were filed by only 14 plaintiffs.

As someone who has used a manual wheelchair for the past 17-years, I understand and appreciate the significance of the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, as a defense attorney I understand that the ADA is severely abused and has become a money making scheme for a small handful of attorneys and serial plaintiffs, said Rachelle Golden, an ADA defense attorney.

The COMPLI Act defines a high-frequency litigant as an individual who has brought 10 or more civil actions alleging ADA violations within the previous 12-month period. The bill aims to limit a high-frequency litigants ability to repeatedly file lawsuits in bad faith and encourages business owners to invest in updating their properties to meet the accessibility standards of the ADA.

The legislation also prohibits damages from being awarded to plaintiffs who were not denied reasonable access or reasonable use to a facility because of an ADA violation, in an attempt to curb drive-by plaintiffs that prey on businesses without ever entering them or attempting to engage them in a business transaction.

Lastly, the bill requires the Department of Justice to submit a report to Congress two years after the bill is enacted, which:

Determines how many people were categorized as a high frequency litigant during the two year period in each state

Provides analysis on whether the bills provisions had an effect on the number of ADA accessibility lawsuits filed

Provides analysis on whether the bills provisions have negatively impacted an individuals ability to bring a legitimate, good-faith accessibility claim

Recommends whether an attorneys fee cap should be introduced in the future to reduce ADA abuse

Most businesses are unaware of what violations they potentially have on their property, and when served with a complaint, they are forced with a decision to fight against the lawsuit, or close their doors. Most often, complaints allege minor, if not trivial violations, that are easily correctable without much difficulty or expense. It is imperative that federal legislature catch up with California state law and provide a notice and opportunity to cure before a lawsuit can be commenced. The COMPLI Act would allow businesses the opportunity to learn of and correct ADA violations before they are forced to engage in costly litigation, added Golden.

The COMPLI Act is supported by small business and small business advocacy groups.

The Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors took action on Thursday, February 25, 2016 to support in concept Congressman McNerneys new bill to protect businesses and the community from drive by lawsuits in regards to the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Harassment and threats by the unscrupulous is not the way to accomplish full compliance! Fairness and cooperation will allow businesses to fully comply with the law if given a fair chance. It is important that the State of California follows the lead of Congressman McNerney and does the same, said Judith Buethe, President of the Greater Stockton Chamber for 2015/16 and owner of Judith Buethe Communications.

Excessive ADA compliance lawsuits forced Chucks Hamburgers in Stockton to relocate after 55 years of service at the same location.

Contined below

 

[mark handler]

“I believe that this particular law was a good one when written. The problem lies with the few people that take advantage of the loophole. I’d like to thank Rep. McNerney for his support on such delicate matters,” said Steve Grant, owner of Chuck’s Hamburgers. “I felt that this law wouldn’t be seen for the negative impact it has on our communities and small businesses because it is lawyer versus lawyer and they manipulate the law. I’d like to thank Rep. McNerney for asking people like me to share my experience and offering small business owners hope that laws such as this will be changed.”

“We are excited about the introduction of the COMPLI Act. This is a necessary bill to ensure that the intent of the ADA is unchanged while providing relief to business to come into compliance without frivolous lawsuits closing their doors. We believe this is a great opportunity for the ADA community to work together with the business community to better educate business on the needs and partner on compliance. We look forward to supporting Congressman McNerney on these efforts and advocating for the bill’s passage,” said Bob Gutierrez, Chairman-elect of the San Joaquin County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

“We are so very glad Congressman McNerney has authored this badly needed bill,” said Pat Patrick, President and CEO of the Lodi District Chamber of Commerce. “Small businesses have been unfairly singled out and targeted by predatory lawyers taking advantage of ADA laws. The law without an enforcement clause has become an unfortunate opportunity for predatory lawyers. The provisions in Congressman McNerney’s ADA bill will give small businesses a 90-window to bring their business into ADA compliance.”

“This bill will allow businesses the opportunity to comply with ADA irregularities within a reasonable 90-day period without the burdensome legal costs of a civil suit. Small businesses are the lifeblood of our local economy and this bill would protect them from predatory lawyers and individuals who target them to obtain a financial settlement. CVACC supports Congressman McNerney on this legislation,” said Dennis Lee, CEO and President of the Central Valley Asian-American Chamber of Commerce.

“The California Delta Chambers & Visitor’s Bureau fully supports Congressman Jerry McNerney’s COMPLI Act. ADA abuses cost local businesses much time and money. We feel this legislation will help curb some of the excesses,” said Bill Wells, Executive Director of the California Delta Chambers & Visitor’s Bureau.

“The Antioch Chamber of Commerce is excited to support the new legislation that Congressman McNerney is bringing forth to update the Americans with Disabilities Act to give our businesses the opportunity to improve their facilities in a timely manner and avoid unlawful suits that are ruining their businesses, the jobs they create, and the ability to support their family,” said Sean Wright, CEO of the Antioch Chamber of Commerce.

The COMPLI Act is now referred to the House Judiciary Committee for consideration.

Rep. Jerry McNerney proudly serves the constituents of California’s 9th Congressional District that includes portions of San Joaquin, Contra Costa, and Sacramento Counties. For more information on Rep. McNerney’s work, follow him on Facebook and on Twitter @RepMcNerney.

 

[mark handler]

Congressman Initiates ADA Reform

by Garth Stapley, The Modesto Bee

https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/10/congressman-ada-reform/22021/

STOCKTON, Calif. – The legislative battle against some predatory lawsuits – a nearly impossible task at the state level – is jumping from California to Washington, D.C., U.S. Rep. Jerry McNerney said this week.

“A fairly small number of individuals and firms are causing this havoc in our businesses,” McNerney, D-Calif., said while announcing federal legislation aimed at significant reform. “A handful of bad actors have taken advantage of the law just to make money.”

He referred to the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires that businesses make life easier for customers with disabilities. Critics say it’s being used in concert with California law to extort payouts from bewildered companies without helping those with disabilities much.

Special reports by The Modesto Bee and Merced Sun-Star in 2014 found that more than 60 businesses had been slapped with ADA lawsuits in Stanislaus and Merced counties. Barnwood Restaurant & Catering in Ripon and Ming’s Restaurant in Los Banos closed rather than fight in court or buckle to settlement demands for tens of thousands of dollars.

Some drive-by plaintiffs “have no intention of entering and enjoying a business,” said McNerney, whose 9th Congressional District includes parts of San Joaquin, Contra Costa and Sacramento counties.

“We had to move,” said Steve Grant, owner of Chuck’s Hamburgers, after 56 years in what had become an outdated Stockton building. Its hallways and bathrooms were too small under ADA regulations, and Grant’s landlord was unwilling to make changes, he said.

Last year, California lawmakers Kristin Olsen, Cathleen Galgiani and Adam Gray all introduced ADA reform bills in Sacramento with controversial “right to cure” provisions giving businesses time to fix violations. Facing stiff opposition, Gray and Galgiani withdrew theirs; the legislature eventually passed a version of Olsen’s after it was watered down, but Gov. Jerry Brown objected to its $250 tax credit for businesses making improvements and vetoed it.

Olsen rebounded this year with Assembly Bill 54, co-authored by Gray, which would require reporting of certain information in a standard format to the California Commission on Disability Access. Both also signed on to Senate Bill 269, which would give businesses with less than 50 employees 120 days to make minor repairs under narrowly tailed conditions that would not apply in most cases. Both bills continue to move through the legislature in Sacramento.

McNerney’s U.S. House of Representatives Bill 4719 aims higher, allowing companies 90 days to correct deficiencies and another 30 days if owners are making “good faith” efforts such as obtaining construction permits or hiring contractors. The legislation also contains a “public shaming” requirement that shops post notices visible to customers while in the process of correcting problems encountered by people with disabilities.

The congressman calls it his COMPLI Act, or Correcting Obstructions to Mediate, Prevent and Limit Inaccessibility. It would define anyone bringing 10 or more lawsuits in a year as a high-frequency litigant, with restrictions on filing more.

Some plaintiffs in Stanislaus County and Merced cases were behind numerous lawsuits, The Bee and Sun-Star found. They include Robert McCarthy, an Arizona man who has sued hundreds of California businesses over 14 years, except when incarcerated on child pornography and fraud convictions.

McCarthy and others have sued in federal court as well as at the county level.

Olsen issued a release commending McNerney and saying it’s “crucial that leaders at both the state and federal level continue to work together” on such reform.

Fresno attorney Rachelle Golden called McNerney’s effort “an amazing step in the right direction.” Injured in a 1999 snowboarding accident, she uses a wheelchair but sympathizes with – and defends in court – companies slapped with ADA lawsuits.

Although conceived as an “important and beautiful thought,” Golden said, “the ADA is severely abused and has become a money-making scheme for a small handful of attorneys and serial plaintiffs.”