That is a straw-man. What is argued is that smoke detectors provide a reasonable level of life safety.TheCommish said:I posted the article because it is often argued the smoke detectors are enough and fire sprinklers are unneed because of the smoke detection, in this case and even with a rapid response of the FD the outcome was not good.
You could say the exact same thing about green codes.incognito said:Same old rhetoric from the sprinkler cartel. It has nothing to do with saving lives. It is all about the money, always has been, always will be. The slimeballs use the fire death of anyone and everyone to push their greedy, self-serving agenda.