To All;
I apologize, I have MIA since sometime last year when I first took the FM position with my Department. I fully intended to be more active in the forum than I have. My most sincere apologies for not having been.
I am seeking guidance in the following matter; I have an approximate 5000 sq. ft. "R2" occupancy that the property owner is seeking to be allowed to occupy (certificate of occupancy). It is setup for only one tenant. We currently follow 2006 IFC (with state amendments). The building is a former "M" occupancy (existing structure,), it is fully sprinkled and has had annual and 5 year inspection, testing, and appropriate repairs made. The electronic supervising devices send their signal to a central station on site which also monitors several other buildings on the same property. (which is not manned 24hrs/7days a week, another problem I'm working on)
Although the sprinkler system is not required, the property owners wish to leave it in place, it has nearly 40 heads. The state amendments require this system to be electronically supervised; testing and supervision of the alarm system falls under 2002 NFPA 72.
Currently, the FCP shows multiple trouble signals, including missing nodes, open circuits, ground fault problems, etc... There is no way for me to accurately know what parts of the system effect the others. It is believed that some of the trouble signals are originated due to some structures on the property being demolished and then not being removed from the FCP system. There is also no documentation on the last inspection activity on the FCP.
...In your opinion...
Would these problems with the FCP be sufficient for me to require re-acceptance testing of the FCP? Could this system be viewed as an impaired system and therefore prevent occupancy of the residential structure until the FCP shows no trouble signal, is inspected, tested and monitored per 2002 NFPA 72?
My goal is to prevent occupancy of the structure until the FCP is monitored continuously and shows no trouble signals.
Any help or advice is most appreciated, thank you in advance.
I apologize, I have MIA since sometime last year when I first took the FM position with my Department. I fully intended to be more active in the forum than I have. My most sincere apologies for not having been.
I am seeking guidance in the following matter; I have an approximate 5000 sq. ft. "R2" occupancy that the property owner is seeking to be allowed to occupy (certificate of occupancy). It is setup for only one tenant. We currently follow 2006 IFC (with state amendments). The building is a former "M" occupancy (existing structure,), it is fully sprinkled and has had annual and 5 year inspection, testing, and appropriate repairs made. The electronic supervising devices send their signal to a central station on site which also monitors several other buildings on the same property. (which is not manned 24hrs/7days a week, another problem I'm working on)
Although the sprinkler system is not required, the property owners wish to leave it in place, it has nearly 40 heads. The state amendments require this system to be electronically supervised; testing and supervision of the alarm system falls under 2002 NFPA 72.
Currently, the FCP shows multiple trouble signals, including missing nodes, open circuits, ground fault problems, etc... There is no way for me to accurately know what parts of the system effect the others. It is believed that some of the trouble signals are originated due to some structures on the property being demolished and then not being removed from the FCP system. There is also no documentation on the last inspection activity on the FCP.
...In your opinion...
Would these problems with the FCP be sufficient for me to require re-acceptance testing of the FCP? Could this system be viewed as an impaired system and therefore prevent occupancy of the residential structure until the FCP shows no trouble signal, is inspected, tested and monitored per 2002 NFPA 72?
My goal is to prevent occupancy of the structure until the FCP is monitored continuously and shows no trouble signals.
Any help or advice is most appreciated, thank you in advance.