• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

2006 IFC; difference between dead end versus path of common travel

You asked the difference between dead-end vs. common path of egress travel. I'll take a stab at an example:

A dead-end could look (in plan view) like the letter "T", with an exit at the bottom of the r. The upper ends of the T go nowhere: you have to back-up to get out.

A "common path" looks like the letter "P", with an exit at the bottom of the P. You can be at the top of the loop of the P, and exit moving forward in either direction, without having to back up. Unfortunately, no matter which direction you go, you will still end up at the same single door.

The "common path" issue has more to do with separation of exit paths separate, and not rejoining them or getting them too close to each other.

There is a code requirement to keep exit doorways separate (1/2 to 1/3 the diagonal). This is an additional requirement to keep the PATHWAYS to those doors separate as well.
 
Top