• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

45 Million Won't Bring Disability Access

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,892
Location
So. CA
$45 Million Dyckman Street Subway Stop Repair Won't Bring Disability Access

Updated July 13, 2010

The MTA says the Inwood station does not meet the regulations for needing accessibility.

http://dnainfo.com/20100712/washington-heights-inwood/45-million-renovation-of-dyckman-street-station-wont-be-accessible-disabled

DNAinfo Reporter/Producer

INWOOD — When the MTA completes its $45 million rebuild of the Dyckman Street 1 train station nearly two years from now, the station will remain inaccessible to people with physical disabilities and mighty difficult for parents with strollers.

The renovated subway stop won't get elevators, an escalator or ramps to help people who can't get up or down stairs on to a subway train, assistant director for MTA NYC Transit Government and Community Relations Marcus Book said during a June 29 community presentation.

“There isn’t enough money to do that,” said Book.

According to the MTA, the station will not become accessible because it is not on the transit agency’s list of 100 “key stations” slated to become Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant by the year 2020.

“Dyckman Street station does not fit the criteria for a key station,” Deirdre Parker, a MTA spokeswoman, wrote in an email. She said the station is not a terminal point, is not a transfer point to other bus or subway lines, is not near any major activity centers and ranks 185th out of 422 stations in ridership.

But James Weisman, senior vice president and general counsel for the United Spinal Association, a disability rights advocacy group, said irrespective of its ability to be called a “key station,” the MTA has a legal obligation to make the station accessible.

Weisman said he believed that ADA regulations require the MTA to spend 20 percent of the cost of a renovation on accessibility, even for the non-key. “$9 million buys a lot of elevators," he said.

Transit analyst and journalist Michael Harris agreed and added that there is a particular need for accessibility in Northern Manhattan. The closest accessible transfer station to the A train for 1 train riders is at 42nd Street.

“It is an area that is really underserved by mass transit as it is,” he added. “It doesn’t make a lot of sense to deprive an entire community of the subway.”

Read more: http://dnainfo.com/20100712/washington-heights-inwood/45-million-renovation-of-dyckman-street-station-wont-be-accessible-disabled#ixzz0tZXXGYJ6
 
Our public institutions will always be playing catch-up in accessibility retro fitting.

Near here the state's "flagship institution of higher learning" is still playing that game, 20+years after ADA.

Most famous incident was in the mid-nineties when a guy who was wheelchair bound wanted to visit the newly established Office of Disability Services, up a long flight of monumental steps from grade.

He called a couple of TV stations, dressed in camo fatigues and boots, and, when the cameras rolled, climbed out of his chair and belly-crawled up the steps to illustrate what a battle it was for him to make an appointment he had with the office established to serve him.

Needless to say, there was egg on some official faces.
 
It's hard to fathom that this is in California where oversight on accessibility is a big deal - AND on something that is just now being constructed. It's one thing if it was an older existing station but new???

Who was doing the design?

Who was doing the accessibility consulting?

Who was doing the oversight from the "Owner's" perspective?

Who was doing the oversight from the compliance and review perspective?

Deirtre Parker doesn't understand. The rules are more extensive for key stations, but ALL stations have to be accessible.

Somebody(s) missed a biggie!
 
Doh!

Nevermiind. Now I completely understand! It's NYC.

I didn't look at the slides. It IS an existing station being renovated. And, yes, $9 million buys a lot of elevators.

(See questions above)
 
Back
Top