jar546
CBO
When tasked with seismic retrofitting of an older building in a dense urban area, what are your key considerations to ensure compliance with seismic codes without excessively disrupting the building's function or surrounding structures?
-
Welcome to The Building Code Forum
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
A Seismic Question for Architects and Engineers
- Thread starter jar546
- Start date
mark handler
SAWHORSE
Residential or commercial?
you will need to "disrupt" the function if interior, or sometimes the surrounding structures if exterior.....
you will need to "disrupt" the function if interior, or sometimes the surrounding structures if exterior.....
jar546
CBO
I am going to go with commercial in this case.
mark handler
SAWHORSE
Interior, you need access to the walls, roof/attic and sometimes the footings...
Exterior, you may or may not have any exterior access....
Exterior, you may or may not have any exterior access....
Yikes
SAWHORSE
I am currently working on a seismic retrofit of a cast-in-place concrete building, originally constructed as a warehouse, now used as an office building.
In general, we try to perform most work on the exterior face of the walls to minimize disruption to the interior. However, this is not always possible on a zero-lot-line condition.
On our particular project, the biggest issue was that when the warehouse was converted to open office, all the expensive infrastructure was placed against the inside face of the exterior walls: switchgear, phone/data, bathrooms, stairwells, etc. Putting additional shear walls (shotcrete) on these exterior walls would be structurally most efficient, however it will be far more disruptive and expensive than inboarding them to the nearest corridor wall, about 15' away.
In general, we try to perform most work on the exterior face of the walls to minimize disruption to the interior. However, this is not always possible on a zero-lot-line condition.
On our particular project, the biggest issue was that when the warehouse was converted to open office, all the expensive infrastructure was placed against the inside face of the exterior walls: switchgear, phone/data, bathrooms, stairwells, etc. Putting additional shear walls (shotcrete) on these exterior walls would be structurally most efficient, however it will be far more disruptive and expensive than inboarding them to the nearest corridor wall, about 15' away.