• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Accessibility for apartments over commercial in a small 2 story building

thomasfagan

Registered User
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Messages
4
Location
oregon
I am designing a small two story, 10000sf mixed use project. Desired program is 5000sf ground level commercial, 5000sf 2nd level residential.

My understanding is if we break the residential up into 3 or less apartments, then none of them would need to be accessible units, and we would not need an accessible route to the 2nd level. If we break them up into 4 or more units then all of chapter 11 would apply and we would need to provide an accessible route to all units on the 2nd level. Did I get this right?
 
1. Where is the project based (so we know the applicable code)?
2. If this a new building, or renovation of an existing building?
3. Are these private dwelling units, or are you getting funding for them form a public source?
 
1. Where is the project based (so we know the applicable code)?
2. If this a new building, or renovation of an existing building?
3. Are these private dwelling units, or are you getting funding for them form a public source?
Oregon. 2022 OSSC which is based on 2021 IBC
New building
Privately funded.

Thanks!
 
It appears that 1108.6.2.2.2 covers "four or more dwelling units", which mirrors the language of the Federal Fair Housing Act.
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/PDF/FAIRHOUSING/fairfull.pdf

Here in California, that scope was changed to apartment developments with 3 or more dwellings (such as yours), or condo developments with 4 or more dwellings. That's why it's helpful to clarify the project's location.

Back to your original question: yes you generally got it right. There are a few obscure exceptions, for example:
If the apartments above are dedicated employee housing for the occupancy below, such that living in the apartment above is a necessary condition of employment on the first floor (caretaker's house, a firehouse, etc.), then the residence is actually part of the place of employment and subject to Title II of ADA.
 
Top