• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Am I missing something?

Joined
Jul 4, 2011
Messages
8
I am new to the world of fire sprinkler design and find myself at a quandry. Im working on a design that requires 31.04 gpm @ 25.949psi with a safty margin of 16.044psi. These calcs were run with a 1" pvc run from the meter to the riser. All of the house's around here that i have looked at (some on the same block, similar in size, and with flat ceilings) have 1 1/4" to 2" runs to the riser. I have triple checked my information but cant shake the feelin im missing something....could this just be a case of bigger is better?
 
Do you happen to have a flow test with static and residual??

and what is it

Or just pressure Gage and what is it???

Do you have the hydraulic calculations to back up the design????
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Two things I find most overlooked:

1. The elevation of the house as compared to the hydrant where the flow test is done (just 'cause there's 50psi at the bottom of the hill doesn't mean you get 50psi at the top of the hill)

2. Failing to account for all of the elbows, tees, valves, RPZ, flow switch etc. I routinely see calcs where they have 2 elbows from 1st to 2nd floor. When I get there they have a dozen.

If you are close on 1" do not paint yourself into a corner when they have to install additional elbows to get around beams, columns etc.
 
According to the water company there is 50psi at the supply. My calculations back up my design with all things considered PLsup,PLsvc,PLm,PLd,and PLe leaving me a healthy cushion. I guess my question is...should i be taking into consideration future demand to the system such as landscaping or future additions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
California

Do you design fire sprinkler systems for a living??

Is this a cvpc system or pex plumbing system??

I think I would confirm with own ideas pressure available

If you truly do have a 16 psi safety not much more you can do for future problems
 
My design is a residential stand-alone systems piped in cpvc. Mabe I'm over thinking it. I thought mabe there was an unwritten rule or consideration for oversizing the service pipe even though flows and preasure did not dictate it.
 
Sound like you are good to go if the hydraulic calcs support the design

And flow test show you have the water, which once again would like to see in person

So how long have you been designing systems???
 
california kid said:
According to the water company there is 50psi at the supply. My calculations back up my design with all things considered PLsup,PLsvc,PLm,PLd,and PLe leaving me a healthy cushion. I guess my question is...should i be taking into consideration future demand to the system such as landscaping or future additions?
What does the water authority guarantee as the minimum level of service? Did they provide you with a historic low for the area?
 
The systems with larger pipe sizes may have been serving both the domestic demand as well as the sprinkler supply. If you have two taps, and one is dedicated to sprinkler service, your calc may be appropriate. But, if you have a single tap that tee's inside the house (and there is no valve to shut-off the domestic side during a fire event, then you may need to increase your flow to account for domestic water usage in addition to sprinkler operation - this can drive a larger pipe size.
 
I have been working on sprinkler designs for less than a year. I use a program from MEP CAD for the calculations. Our area does not require that we design to historic lows but i understand that some do. ....Kid
 
Aegis, the sprinklers and domestic have a common supply pipe, i have added 5gpm to the flow to compensate. Is there any consideration for landscape demand? I can find nothing in the code for this.
 
Back
Top