• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

An IBC R-1 AirBnB: common path & other oddities

wtravisl

REGISTERED
Joined
Dec 2, 2021
Messages
23
Location
Texas, US
Hello!
A client of mine has an interesting request: purpose-built large AirBnB units (8BR, 16 guests) for short-term (<30 days) rental, that will obtain full-fledged hotel licenses, and as such, need to be constructed according to IBC R-1 occupancy requirements. Imagine large, 3-story detached houses...but with IBC Type V-B, hotel (transient) occ, very brightly lit staircases... It's a little bit odd, but I'm glad they're not pushing to sneak them in under IRC.

A single unenclosed staircase per unit, as you'd expect in a house, seems attainable based on table 1006.2.1 single-exit space (10 ppl max = 2000gsf/floor, we're well below). Other subsections in 1006 back this up, and also affirm that 4 stories or less is fine for an open stair in an R-1 dwelling unit. Also, 1019.3 exception 2 states says that such a stair in R-1 is an unenclosed exit access stairway.

But what about CPET? My 3rd floor occupants don't get to choose between 2 exits, ever. Do I have to extend CPET from the 3rd floor corner to the front door (no way it will comply), or does it stop on each floor at the exit access stair itself?

I sense that I can measure CPET to the stair entry on each floor, because it's a single-exit building, and focus on "Exit Access Travel Distance" (1017) for that worst-case 3rd floor to front door travel, but I don't see this clearly spelled out. Am I wrong? If not, does anyone know of an 'official' interpretation that backs this up?

And when that stair reaches the ground floor somewhere in the interior of the building, still unenclosed, what is my obligation for the remaining exit access distance to an exterior egress door? If I'm reading 1016.2 correctly, I don't see any need to rate or enclose anything - just don't force people to go through the kitchen.

Thank you-
 
Assuming single-exit upper stories are allowed in R-1, 1017.3.1 establishes that exit access travel distance is measured down the stairs. The definition of common path of egress travel describes it as part of the exit access travel distance, so it seems like that means it is measured the same way. I don’t see how a single-exit story is allowed, though.
 
Jay, thank you for responding.

Means of egress per story is defined in 1006.3, and 1006.3.4 lists acceptable conditions for single exit or "access to single exit" stories & occupied roofs, and I'm confident we'll meet several of these.

After more thought and review, I'm still not convinced that CPET should be measured floor-to-floor (still seems completely redundant with 1017 Exit Access Travel) but based on Table 1006.3.4(2) it doesn't matter: that table explicitly says that my single-exit story condition in R-1 requires a max overall exit travel distance of 75' (not 250' as in 1017), which is identical to CPET in 1006.2.1.
 
Here‘s my take on 1006.3.4:
  1. Table 1006.3.4(1) does not apply because this is not R-2. Table 1006.3.4(2) does not allow R-1 on the second or third story above grade plane.
  2. The upper stories do not discharge directly to the exterior.
  3. Parking garage provision does not apply.
  4. Groups R-3 and R-4 do not apply.
  5. The dwelling unit exceeds the maximum occupant load in 1006.2.1.
 
The design meets #5, provided each story is occupied by fewer than 10 persons (<2000 gsf), according to 1006.3.1.
 
Hello!
A client of mine has an interesting request: purpose-built large AirBnB units (8BR, 16 guests) for short-term (<30 days) rental, that will obtain full-fledged hotel licenses, and as such, need to be constructed according to IBC R-1 occupancy requirements. Imagine large, 3-story detached houses...but with IBC Type V-B, hotel (transient) occ, very brightly lit staircases... It's a little bit odd, but I'm glad they're not pushing to sneak them in under IRC.

A single unenclosed staircase per unit, as you'd expect in a house, seems attainable based on table 1006.2.1 single-exit space (10 ppl max = 2000gsf/floor, we're well below). Other subsections in 1006 back this up, and also affirm that 4 stories or less is fine for an open stair in an R-1 dwelling unit. Also, 1019.3 exception 2 states says that such a stair in R-1 is an unenclosed exit access stairway.

But what about CPET? My 3rd floor occupants don't get to choose between 2 exits, ever. Do I have to extend CPET from the 3rd floor corner to the front door (no way it will comply), or does it stop on each floor at the exit access stair itself?

I sense that I can measure CPET to the stair entry on each floor, because it's a single-exit building, and focus on "Exit Access Travel Distance" (1017) for that worst-case 3rd floor to front door travel, but I don't see this clearly spelled out. Am I wrong? If not, does anyone know of an 'official' interpretation that backs this up?

And when that stair reaches the ground floor somewhere in the interior of the building, still unenclosed, what is my obligation for the remaining exit access distance to an exterior egress door? If I'm reading 1016.2 correctly, I don't see any need to rate or enclose anything - just don't force people to go through the kitchen.

Thank you-
AirBnB units (8BR, 16 guests) for short-term (<30 days) rental, that will obtain full-fledged hotel licenses,
If you go this route you will need to let your client know that units and the site if Licensed as a full-fledged hotel will need to be in 100% compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act since all the units and the site will affect commerce.
 
Thank you.
Yes, agree 100%. Good client: they stated their intent to take accessibility seriously unprompted, during our initial discussion.
 
Back
Top