• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Ashrae 62.1

gbhammer

REGISTERED
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Messages
1,279
Location
Mid West
How often does anyone of you receive all the documentation required for an indoor air quality control procedure?
 
mtlogcabin said:
What code section requires it
IMC 403.2 requires outdoor air, and T403.3 is over the top restrictive, so some mechanical engineers try to bring the cfm's down with ASHRAE 62 as allowed for in IMC 105. The problem is that the documentation requirements are excessive.
 
mtlogcabin said:
The numbers in T403.3 are minimum and you can't lower them through any means.
I would say respectfully that the 2003 IMC commentary would disagree with you, and that the 2009 IMC 403.2 exception spells out the allowance of an engineered system.
 
My :oops:

Well then do you require an engineer to provide electrical calculations for what they design, or the structural engineer theirs? That is basically what you would be receiving. I would think a note on the stamped and signed plans indicating the ventilation is designed in accordance with ASHRE 62.1 would suffice. How about having them provide a Table similar to 403.3 indicating the "designed" cfm rates for the different occupancies. Remember it is a system that you have no way of knowing if it will work properly or not so why worry about all the details
 
Awe no need to feel bashful or anything likes that. I do upon occasion require calculations, if only to have the documentation in the event of catastrophic failure. Basically to cover the old backside.
 
Okay folks, I'd like to reopen this thread and see if we can have some more intellectual discussions about this. In my opinion, gbhammer was most certainly on the right track with their opening statement. Where a design professional chooses to reduce the minimum outdoor air rates from IMC Table 403.3, it is the responsibility of the code professional to verify compliance to those alternative methods, not just allow a simple note on the plans that states "I comply". BTW, in my juristiction, we do require electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and structural calculations, and we review them all for compliance to the applicable codes.

First, the codes. The 2009 International Existing Building Code references ASHRAE 62, Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Procedure in section 709.2. The 2009 International Mechanical Code indirectly references ASHRAE 62, IAQ Procedure in section 403.2 (exception) by stating “where a RDP demonstrates that an engineered ventilation system will prevent the maximum concentration of contaminants from exceeding ….” These code sections will allow the use of ASHRAE 62 IAQ procedure.

Now the questions. 1- Are gbhammer and myself the only ones who have been approached by an air filtering manufacturer (or design professional) requesting to use this procedure (as a selling point for their product)? 2- Are gbhammer and myself the only ones asking for the documentation required to accurately evaluate this procedure? This procedure will attempt to significantly reduce the minimum outdoor airflow rates provided in IMC Table 403.3.

Food for thought … direct quotes from AHSRAE 62.1-2007 Appendix B

“At present, no single organization develops acceptable concentrations or exposures for all indoor air contaminants, nor are values available for all contaminants of potential concern.”

In reference to Tables B-1 and B-2, “Meeting one, some, or all of the listed values does not ensure that acceptable indoor air quality will be achieved.”

In reference to Table B-2, “ASHRAE does not recommend their adoption as regulatory values, standards, or guidelines.”
 
Thank you, Gary. I've here before (as evident of my join date), but due to technical issues that frustrated me, I gave up :/ On a whim, I came back for another try and after a few days of conversing with the webmaster, I was able to join again :)
 
Back
Top