Question That
REGISTERED
Family Practice. Want to provide for a porte cochere that is potentially attached at one side of a building. My understanding is that this, by definition, even though it is attached, meets the definition of a canopy.
Furthermore, when I read section 3105- Awnings and canopies, all the chapter describes is that the covering (meaning roof in my mind for a porte cochere) needs to meet certain combustibility requirements.
So, where in the code would I need to look to that would tell me that a canopy may need to be protected by a sprinkler system (when the rest of the building is not required to have a sprinkler system).
Furthermore, when I read section 3105- Awnings and canopies, all the chapter describes is that the covering (meaning roof in my mind for a porte cochere) needs to meet certain combustibility requirements.
So, where in the code would I need to look to that would tell me that a canopy may need to be protected by a sprinkler system (when the rest of the building is not required to have a sprinkler system).