• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

CFM reducer for residential hoods

Curious as to what this does to the warranty of the hood?

I would think the increased back pressure would not be recommended by the mfr. Fan works harder, burns out...

Also, what happens down the road when the hood gets changed out? Will new owner/installer know there is a "restrictor plate" installed?

I vote no, unless approved by the hood mfr.

mj
 
I would say no also. There's a reason most hood manufacturer's have minimum duct size right in the installation instructions. Also, at least in our jurisdiction, we go straight of the nameplate rating for residential hood cfm. If the nameplate rating is over 400cfm, makeup air required.
 
You are all echoing my thought. My first concern was about the back-pressure from the fan. I like the term "restrictor plate" as well. My objection to the BO was that you can restrict the air coming out of the other side of the restriction but they will still be trying to force in air on the intake side. What I am seeing is a bunch of 600 to 700 cfm hoods. My recommendation will be to not permit it. Provide make up air.

Thanks to all. I really appreciate this forum.
 
Quick update, the "restrictor plate" came from the same manufacturer. The hood requires a 6" duct, this would reduce that. I told them if they get a letter stating it is acceptable to reduce the duct, won't harm the listing and that the back pressure isn't an issue for the fan or for the effect on the room we could revisit the option.
 
That is one solution that would provide relief but the code states that a system capable of exhausting in excess of 400cfm. So unless a permanent speed control were put on it wouldn't meet the code. I did receive a letter back from the mfr but it left a little to be desired. It has been decided to not allow the restrictor plate for the reasons mentioned in previous posts. Several more have been found since the first post and most say they will simply change out the units after finding that the options for altering them are either too prohibitive or would violate the listings. Word has quickly spread and most are paying closer attention to the cfm on the fans they are installing now.
 
It would helpful for those of us in cyber-land to get the code section along with the quote. I have never heard of the 400cfm rule and would like to look it up and read it for myself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top