• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Cinema giant AMC settles Disabilities Act lawsuit with Justice Department

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,883
Location
So. CA
Cinema giant AMC settles Disabilities Act lawsuit with Justice Department

November 18, 2010 | Los Angeles Times

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/11/amc-settles-disabilities-act-lawsuit-with-justice-department-.html

AMC Entertainment has settled a decade-old lawsuit filed by the Justice Department under the Americans With Disabilities Act that alleged the nation's No. 2 movie-theater circuit failed to provide adequate wheelchair seating as required by law.

Settlement of the civil lawsuit, originally filed in 1999 in federal court in Los Angeles, was announced Thursday by the Justice Department.

The agreement will "improve the theater-going experience for people who use wheelchairs and their companions at AMC stadium-style theaters nationwide," the Justice Department said.

Under the agreement, AMC will design theaters that place wheelchair-accessible seating near the middle of the auditorium rather than in or close to the front.

"Going to the movies is an archetypal American leisure activity,'' said Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Justice Department. "We are pleased that AMC is taking steps to provide persons who use wheelchairs with access to the enhanced viewing experience of stadium-style theaters.''

The Justice Department filed its lawsuit in 1999 after receiving complaints about wheelchair access at AMC theaters and conducting its own investigation. The lawsuit alleged that AMC's theaters failed to provide people who use wheelchairs with comparable lines of sight to those of other moviegoers, with accessible seating often situated at or near the very front of auditoriums.

“We are happy to settle this lawsuit in a cooperative manner and will be undertaking the required modifications to our theaters in the near future," said AMC spokesman Justin Scott.
 
Eleven years.

And the end result is that AMC will do what they were obligated to do in 1990.

That's 20 years worth of profiting from the ADA.
 
Gosh... for more than 10 years we've enforced accessible seating peppered throughout theaters... back, front, middle.. all aisle seats granted..
 
Most DOJ settlements include a requirement of the violators pay civil penalties, costs and attorneys fees.
 
peach said:
Gosh... for more than 10 years we've enforced accessible seating peppered throughout theaters... back, front, middle.. all aisle seats granted..
And our small local movie theater installed two handicapped spots in a reasonable location without being asked. They did it when they replaced the other seats a few years ago and there is one spot on either side of the aisle about midway up in the theater. Makes you wonder...................

Sue, on the snowy frontier
 
Alias said:
And our small local movie theater installed two handicapped spots in a reasonable location without being asked. They did it when they replaced the other seats a few years ago and there is one spot on either side of the aisle about midway up in the theater. Makes you wonder................... Sue, on the snowy frontier
Sue

you do know the CBC has a more restrictive requirement

CBC 1104B.3.3 Variety of locations. Accessible seating or accommodations in places of public amusement and resort, including theaters, concert halls and stadiums, shall be provided in a variety of locations so as to provide persons with disabilities a choice of admission prices otherwise available

to members of the general public.
 
"...variety of locations SO as to provide... a choice of admission prices". If movie theater seating is a flat general admission price, the CBC requirment alone would not necessarily provide safe harbor in this DOJ suit, which is mroe about "enhancing the viewing experience".

More typically, the problem is in theaters with steep stadium style seating, which may create the need for an elevator or an inclined lift. More recent designs have the audience entering mid-level in these theaters. (This often has the added planning dept. benefit of reducing the overall building height.)

OT: In the mid 1980's my recently-widowed mom decided to go to the movies herself - - and she hadn't paid for her own ticket since the early 1950s. When I told her ticket prices, she was shocked: "SIX dollars to see a movie?!?! Well then, how much are the balcony seats?".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mark - you're right, CBC is not "safe harbor" per se. I should've responded more directly to your comment: in the instance of 100% flat / general admission prices, the CBC's variety-of-price basis could be LESS restrictive than the DOJ settlement, which is based not just on ticket price but also on viewing experience.
 
Back
Top