• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Class 1 Div 1 Switch

jar546

CBO
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
12,938
Location
Not where I really want to be
Anyone see anything wrong with this install at a propane filling station pit?

Maybe yes, maybe no...........Hmmmmmmmmmm:

IMAG0108.jpg
 
No supports, upper seal appears to be acceptable location as boundary and enclosure seal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
= = = =

Possibly, not enough pipe threads engaged in to the top of the switch and

in to the top of the explosionproof coupling [ see Article 500.8(E) ].

= = = =
 
North Star that is what I was questioning as well. "Fully engaged" ? I thought the listed union had to be between the seal and enclosure or I may be out in left field.
 
* * *

Greg,

I could not find [ the article ] where the union was ' required ' to be located

between the seal and the switch, only if it is, ...it is required to be an

"explosion proof" type. Maybe the union in the picture isn't

"explosion-proof" listed!

Looks like the person threading the RMC didn't want to cut & thread any

more pipe, so they stuck the union on the up-side of the seal fitting.

Installing a union closer to the switch; or in the case of the Plumbing

trade, it makes good common sense to install the union closer to the

appliance, or fixture, for easier removal of the appliance, or fixture,

or in this picture [ case ], the switch.

* * *
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any resident experts see anything here on this one? I am not going to post anything in hopes of stimulating some technical conversation with code sections...........................
 
We are still under the 2002 NEC for the code sections I feel need to be addressed.

1)501.4(A)(1)(a) Threaded joints shall be made up with at least five threads fully engaged.

2)501.5(A)(1) Only explosionproof unions,couplings,reducers etc. allowed.

3)501.5(A)(4)Except for listed explosionproofreducers at the conduit seal, there shall be no union, coupling, box, or fitting between the conduit seal and the point at which the conduit leaves thr Division 1 location.

I would like to know how many inspectors are actually inspecting the packing of the seal offs, wire seperation, 5/8'' thickness of compound and if any watch the mixing/pouring of the compound?
 
I believe that SBerg stated something about supporting of the RMC in this pic. See Article 344.30

in the `08 NEC ( i.e. - Where are the conduit supports? ).

Great pic. and discussion Jeff!

.
 
Back
Top