Hi Folks,
I have no experience with Comcheck, and I'm newly working in TX. I've always gone the prescriptive route, look up my R-values in the ASHRAE and meet them.
So, why then would I go through the tedious mess of comcheck if I can avoid it? Is there any real benefit? Am I missing some downside to the prescriptive approach?
This building I'm working on has a substantial amount of window area - so I'm thinking that Comcheck would actually perhaps not let me do this, whereas prescriptive path might - it looks like ASHRAE 90.1, 2013 does not care about fenestration orientation and only sets the max window area at 40% of gross wall area? Whereas I have to feed comcheck window areas, U factor, SGHC, orientation, projection factors, etc. etc.
I'm noticing Houston requires Comcheck, are other TX municipalities starting to require it?
I appreciate your feedback!
I have no experience with Comcheck, and I'm newly working in TX. I've always gone the prescriptive route, look up my R-values in the ASHRAE and meet them.
So, why then would I go through the tedious mess of comcheck if I can avoid it? Is there any real benefit? Am I missing some downside to the prescriptive approach?
This building I'm working on has a substantial amount of window area - so I'm thinking that Comcheck would actually perhaps not let me do this, whereas prescriptive path might - it looks like ASHRAE 90.1, 2013 does not care about fenestration orientation and only sets the max window area at 40% of gross wall area? Whereas I have to feed comcheck window areas, U factor, SGHC, orientation, projection factors, etc. etc.
I'm noticing Houston requires Comcheck, are other TX municipalities starting to require it?
I appreciate your feedback!