• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Coming soon (or not) to an IBC near you

Yankee Chronicler

REGISTERED
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
3,390
Location
New England
[I wasn't sure whether this belongs in Administrative, or under the Commercial Building Code heading. I think it's more pertinent to administration, but I won't be offended if it gets moved.]

One of the things we almost always get into arguments about with design professionals (usually structural engineers, in this case) is statements of special inspections. We often get applications for new buildings that don't have a statement of special inspections, then we get into an argument over whether or not it's required (yes, it is -- it says so right in the code), and then we go round and round about whether or not the SSI is filled out completely. Recently, we've seen an epidemic of pre-engineered metal buildings (PEMB) in town, and the statements of special inspection for tose are a nightmare because there are TWO engineers-of-record: the PEMB superstructure is designed, signed and sealed by an engineer in East Overshoe who is responsible for the metal building, but the foundations are designed by a local engineer who is only responsible for the footings and foundations. Properly speaking, there should be two separate statements of special inspections, unless the owner pays the local engineer to take on the role of special inspections coordinator for the superstructure in addition to the foundation.

When my state adopted the 2021 IBC in 2022, we added a section to chapter 17 that specifically described special inspections for PEMB. On one of the recent PEMB projects we asked for a SSI for the PEMB portion of the project. The owner submitted a letter from the PEMB company's engineer which stated that no special inspections were required -- and he included a special inspection table listing several special inspections tasks as "Not required." This left us in a urination contest with the owner, because we had to insist that it didn't matter what the PEMB engineer claimed, the code requires special inspections for PEMBs, so we needed a SSI that covers the specific inspection tasks called out in the code. Ultimately, the owner paid the foundation engineer to take on the special inspections role for the superstructure.

I'm mentioning this because special inspections for PEMBs has been added to the 2024 IBC, as section 1705.2.6. As states and jurisdictions begin to adopt the 2024 I-Codes, this is one of the changes to be aware of.

1720839489671.png
 
The PEMB RDP needs to provide a Statement of Professional Opinion 111.1.3 Ct. 2021 IBC prior to the C of O being issued how can this be done without doing inspections?


going on a tangent, I have heard the bolt tightening in certain cases no long need a special inspection
 
Seems to me that a Metal Bldg is not just a collection of "Standard Parts and Pieces" like concrete, rebar, and wood joist ( Or even Bar joist on standard structural steel.

It is designed and warranted by the Manufacturer of a complete Assembly and someone who is completely familiar with the Fabricators Erection Requirements needs to be engaged to Reassure the Inspector, who has a Generic understanding of STANDARD Building Practices, that the SPECIAL Bldg Standards have been Met.

It is about being the Inspector and Not the Design Professional

IMHO

Mike
 
Back
Top