The reason that I posted this is because of the usual story we hear from contractors whenever they come into one of our municipalities and it sounds like this: "We just did 2 jobs in Abc town and they passed it."
Not much infuriates me more so I am going to go on a rant using this as a subject.
WARNING, I will be very opinionated, harsh and direct. Unfortunately, since I am the administrator for this forum I will be viewed as a bully which I don't like, which is one of the reasons I try not to post stuff like this.
First and foremost, I would like to know why plan reviewers and inspectors simply choose not to enforce minimum requirements. Is it because?:
1) They don't know what they are doing themselves. (they don't know what they don't know)
2) They don't have any adopted codes to go by and therefore wing it.
3) There are adopted amendments to the code that exclude those requirements.
4) They are lazy.
5) They feel it is OK to be arbitrary on code officiating based on what mood they are in.
6) They don't think it's important.
7) All of the contractors are so professional, accurate and code knowledgable that they often wonder why they even have a job since there is no reason to do review or inspections.
I really can't think of any other excuse or reason and more than likely it's an excuse and not a reason.
These residential systems are pretty simple for the most part. Air goes in, air comes back, air goes back out again. Houses like mine also take advantage of outside, fresh air. If you can't balance the system then it will never function properly, it will strain the blower motor causing an increase in the electrical bill and cause the system to run more often since it is out of balance and inefficient.
What a disservice to the community and homeowners to take a stance of inadequate, lazy, ineffective code enforcement. For what reason I ask you?
I lived in a 10 year old house with a common return which did not have jumper ducts or transfer grills and did not have adequate undercutting of the doors. This was my direct experience:
1) My electric bill was high
2) We had to leave the doors open almost all of the way to keep them from being sucked shut whenever the system came on
3) If we closed the doors for privacy, the bedrooms were hot or cold depending on time of year while other parts of the house were at the correct temperature
4) The cycle time was longer when the system was on
I now live in a house that has jumper ducts in the attic from ceiling to ceiling and:
1) My electric bill is much lower
2) I never have to leave doors open in order for the system to work properly
3) The temperature is very consistent due to the correct balancing of the system
4) The cycle time is less, hence resulting in #1
IF you have adopted the I-Codes then you have a legal obligation to ensure that construction meets a minimum standard. In this case, the mechanical and energy section of the IRC fully covers forced air systems.
So what is your excuse?