jar546
Forum Coordinator
How do you folks handle this?
For arguments sake, lets go with commercial jobs first.
Contractor makes a change that is code compliant but is not what is on the approved plans that are stamped by a design professional. Here are some examples:
1) Electrical engineer designs a grounding system with 3 5/8" 10' rods in a triangle, 10' apart. Electrician installs a concrete encased electrode and one rod which isnt even needed at this point.
2) Lightframe construction for a doctor's office has 10" thick footers specified on the prints with 4,000psi strength concrete. The contractor installs 7-1/2" footers with 3,500psi strength concrete. Both installs by the contractor are determined to exceed the prescriptive code as adopted but don't meet the specs of the prints. Although the contractor deviated from the prints, what they did actually exceeded the code requirements prescriptively for light frame construction.
In both instances, the contractors tell you that you are there for code compliance only and not there to enforce issues beyond the code minimum. They state that this is a contractural issue between the contractor and the owner and that you as a code official are only there to ensure that the minimum code has been complied with, nothing more.
In PA we have the PA-UCC which addresses this issue. We did not adopt Chapter 1 of the IBC and ours states:
For arguments sake, lets go with commercial jobs first.
Contractor makes a change that is code compliant but is not what is on the approved plans that are stamped by a design professional. Here are some examples:
1) Electrical engineer designs a grounding system with 3 5/8" 10' rods in a triangle, 10' apart. Electrician installs a concrete encased electrode and one rod which isnt even needed at this point.
2) Lightframe construction for a doctor's office has 10" thick footers specified on the prints with 4,000psi strength concrete. The contractor installs 7-1/2" footers with 3,500psi strength concrete. Both installs by the contractor are determined to exceed the prescriptive code as adopted but don't meet the specs of the prints. Although the contractor deviated from the prints, what they did actually exceeded the code requirements prescriptively for light frame construction.
In both instances, the contractors tell you that you are there for code compliance only and not there to enforce issues beyond the code minimum. They state that this is a contractural issue between the contractor and the owner and that you as a code official are only there to ensure that the minimum code has been complied with, nothing more.
In PA we have the PA-UCC which addresses this issue. We did not adopt Chapter 1 of the IBC and ours states:
We use that reference to cite those that question what we are there for.Work shall be installed in accordance with the approved construction documents. The permit holder shall submit a revised set of construction documents for approval for changes made during construction that are not in accordance with the approved construction documents.