• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Continuity of Exterior Bearing Wall Fire Rating at Building Stepback

Harrison Staab

REGISTERED
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Messages
30
Location
Manhattan, KS
Where a building steps back, does the supporting walls/structure need to maintain the same fire rating of the exterior bearing wall above?

Specific application:
California Building Code 2019 (sim. to IBC 2018)
Six stories, 5 IIIA over 1 IA
Group R-2 Multi-family apartment
Type IIIA construction with 2-hr exterior bearing walls
At fourth floor, the building steps back, with a 2-hr exterior bearing wall directly supported by a 1-hr fire partition (a dwelling unit separation wall).
Does this supporting fire partition wall need to be 2-hr rated?

EXT-BEARING-WALL.png

I believe section 705.6 is at play:
705.6 Structural Stability

Exterior walls shall extend to the height required by Section 705.11. Interior structural elements that brace the exterior wall but that are not located within the plane of the exterior wall shall have the minimum fire-resistance rating required in Table 601 for that structural element. Structural elements that brace the exterior wall but are located outside of the exterior wall or within the plane of the exterior wall shall have the minimum fire-resistance rating required in Tables 601 and 602 for the exterior wall.

Would the wall below the exterior wall be considered "within the plane of the exterior wall" and thus be required to have a 2-hr fire rating as required by Table 601 for exterior bearing walls?
 
And bonus follow-up question. What if the supporting element below is a beam. Is this a 1-hr rated primary frame? Is this 2-hr to match the wall above?
 
Harrison, I was doing a search on 510.5 and came across your question that appears to have gone unanswered. I'm going to say in my own opinion, the answer is "no". The interior support wall in your illustration is not "within the plane" of the exterior wall. It is "below the plane" of the exterior wall.

I believe the intent of the phase "in the plane" is to address situations such as occur in typical platform framing, where someone builds 2-hour rated walls, but between the sill plates the floor structure is just a single rim joist/blocking that's only good for one hour.
See https://www.woodworks.org/cad-revit-details/light-frame/type-iiia-exterior-wall-floor-intersection/
 
IBC 704.1 says "... The fire-resistance ratings shall be not less than the ratings required for the fire-resistance-rated assemblies supported by the structural members."
 
Back
Top