• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Defining Detached

Dennis

Dennis

REGISTERED
Joined
Jan 26, 2012
Messages
745
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
I am going to working on a detached/attached garage with an apartment above. The only means of attachment to the house is a deck. The plumbing will tie into the house sewer and water lines so the inspector thinks it is attached. I stated that power lines often go from the house to a detached structure and that does not change its status. Anyway the state inspectors- both building and electrical agree with me but I was not satisfied with the why.

So I guess first off is the deck touching the garage making the building attached. IMO, no but what say you. And what about this plumbing statement-heard this second hand.

The reason is I want to put the service on the garage building not next to the house meter 75+ feet away. Local building guy is the only one holding this up.
 
If the deck is attached to both structures, that is a good argument that all three are attached.

Will the connection to the water & sewer be made inside the existing house or in the yard somewhere? Not sure it makes a difference but just curious.
 
Mac said:
If the deck is attached to both structures, that is a good argument that all three are attached. Will the connection to the water & sewer be made inside the existing house or in the yard somewhere? Not sure it makes a difference but just curious.
Click to expand...
I assumed in the house but that really should not matter as I explain when electricity is fed from the house it does not change the status.Go one step further-- suppose instead of a deck it was a patio. Does that change it? Suppose they kept the deck 2 inches from the garage. What that does is simply make the deck not as sturdy and makes it look crappy. Is the deck really a question of fire spreading between the building? Seems highly unlikely
 
I would not consider it attached. For me, it would need to share a roof &/or wall with the other part of the structure.
 
There are several things going on here that would need clarification; understand your state laws and local zoning ordinance may allow this regardless.

A deck IMHO does not make the structures attached; need a roof or at least a breezeway connecting the two buildings. See IBC for definitions and terms not given in the IRC;

AREA, BUILDING. The area included within surrounding exterior walls (or exterior walls and fire walls) exclusive of vent shafts and courts. Areas of the building not provided with surrounding walls shall be included in the building area if such areas are included within the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above.

An apartment as legally defined would require its own meter; here it's the POCO decision where it's located.

E3601.6.2 Service disconnect location. The service disconnecting means shall be installed at a readily accessible location either outside of a building or inside nearest the point of entrance of the service conductors. Service disconnecting means shall not be installed in bathrooms. Each occupant shall have access to the disconnect serving the dwelling unit in which they reside.

Then the matter of unfused line to the disconnects.

No issue with the plumbing code if both buildings on are the same lot:

701.3 Separate sewer connection. Every building having plumbing fixtures installed and intended for human habitation, occupancy or use on premises abutting on a street, alley or easement in which there is a public sewer shall have a separate connection with the sewer. Where located on the same lot, multiple buildings shall not be prohibited from connecting to a common building sewer that connects to the public sewer.

Francis
 
I'm with Mac. If the deck uses both structures for support, then I would consider it attached and one structure. Plumbing and electrical considerations do not factor into the decision. My 2 cents.
 
Thanks all-- I am soley looking at this in terms of installing the meter on the separate structure. If the building were considered attached then the meter there would only be allowed one service drop to the building so we would have to install the meter & disconnect at the main service of the house. We want a separate drop to the house. The power company has no issue with it however they will not do it if the city won't allow it.
 
north star said:
* = = *Article 230.2, `08 NEC ?

= * * =
Click to expand...
Yes that is the article that will not allow multiple services if it is attached.

David Henderson said:
200' deep lot with garage in back corner I want to run power and water to the garage so now it will become attached, that's friggin crazy. IMHO
Click to expand...
I hear ya. I don't know where they come up with these rules.
 
Multiple answers:

For zoning, I would let it go as attached if that made life easier for the owner.

As far as occupancy, if it is attached, then there is still one dwelling. It has two dwelling units. I.e. it is a two-family dwelling.

Having two service drops is no different from how a "duplex" would be wired in many jurisdictions - though there's probably someone somewhere who only allows one drop.
 
brudgers said:
Multiple answers: For zoning, I would let it go as attached if that made life easier for the owner.

As far as occupancy, if it is attached, then there is still one dwelling. It has two dwelling units. I.e. it is a two-family dwelling.

Having two service drops is no different from how a "duplex" would be wired in many jurisdictions - though there's probably someone somewhere who only allows one drop.
Click to expand...
I think the difference is that a condo is owned by difference people so their meters must be on the part of the building that they live in-- also firewalls make them detached. That is my point here-- no fire wall needed if the walls don't get attached.

Not sure about a duplex as they can be individually owned or often one owner but again their would be a firewall making the buildings separate.
 
No firewall in a duplex......one building.....

Dennis said:
I think the difference is that a condo is owned by difference people so their meters must be on the part of the building that they live in-- also firewalls make them detached. That is my point here-- no fire wall needed if the walls don't get attached.Not sure about a duplex as they can be individually owned or often one owner but again their would be a firewall making the buildings separate.
Click to expand...
 
= = =



In defense of the Single Service to a property... In my experience

in this AHJ, once a secondary service drop [ i.e. - another meter ]

to a property is allowed, the originally proposed hobby shed /

detached garage has now become another dwelling on the property,

to house whomever......Once that Pandora's Door has been opened,

it then becomes harder to enforce Article 230.2 & any Zoning

requirements.....In some more words, ...promises are [ typically ]

made to get a permit issued and after the project is completed,

the structure now turns in to something totally different.



$ $ $

 
north star said:
= = =

In defense of the Single Service to a property... In my experience

in this AHJ, once a secondary service drop [ i.e. - another meter ]

to a property is allowed, the originally proposed hobby shed /

detached garage has now become another dwelling on the property,

to house whomever......Once that Pandora's Door has been opened,

it then becomes harder to enforce Article 230.2 & any Zoning

requirements.....In some more words, ...promises are [ typically ]

made to get a permit issued and after the project is completed,

the structure now turns in to something totally different.



$ $ $

Click to expand...
It is already a dwelling unit, whether it has it's own service or not.
 
That is not the case here as we are putting an apartment in above the garage. This is walking distance to the University so it will rent fast to a graduate student
 
From a zoning perspective I would consider them attached.

From a building perspective I would require the applicant to undertake a limiting distance calculation to check for permitted construction type, combustibility of siding, area of unprotected openings and possible wall rating.
 
Attached or not, our zoning regulations require additional covered parking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top