Robert
REGISTERED
Hello. I am new to your forum and thank you in advance.
I am working on a tenant improvement (business) under the CPC and our occupancy load is less than 50. Does using the unisex exception #422.2 (3) trump using the table 422.1 for the NUMBER of fixtures? In other words, I believe the table is asking for a toilet AND urinal for men....and note 3 says in no case shall women's toilets be less than the combined men's toilets & urinals. This means we need 2 toilets for women...therefore one unisex will not work. But if the unisex exception trumps the table, than I'm thinking just one unisex will suffice. How do you interpret this? Also, do I still need to install a urinal AND a toilet in the unisex (per the table). It seems redundant.Thanks again...I have had no luck getting the local jurisdictions response.
I am working on a tenant improvement (business) under the CPC and our occupancy load is less than 50. Does using the unisex exception #422.2 (3) trump using the table 422.1 for the NUMBER of fixtures? In other words, I believe the table is asking for a toilet AND urinal for men....and note 3 says in no case shall women's toilets be less than the combined men's toilets & urinals. This means we need 2 toilets for women...therefore one unisex will not work. But if the unisex exception trumps the table, than I'm thinking just one unisex will suffice. How do you interpret this? Also, do I still need to install a urinal AND a toilet in the unisex (per the table). It seems redundant.Thanks again...I have had no luck getting the local jurisdictions response.