Papio Bldg Dept
REGISTERED
I am currently faced with another issue that I am having difficulty resolving, or more precisely defining the limits of compliance. As we progress with our transition plan and develop education and training programs for contractors, developers, and engineers, we are constantly confronted with new questions and new design solutions which toe the line between compliant and non-compliant, and present gray areas which challenge the intent of the ADA & available guidelines.
I have a photograph of a double perpendicular curb ramp at a 90 degree intersection in the Public Right of Way (PROW) showing the intermediate surface between the two curb ramps as concrete with a pronounced brick pattern. For the most part these ramps are in compliance, however, the side flare slope adjacent to the brick patterned surface exceeds 10% and the DWP alignment exceeds 8” from face of curb, and in our opinion, is therefore non-compliant.
The developer’s engineer is raising the question that the hard surfaced area adjacent to the ramps is not a pedestrian circulation path (R303.2.1.4 Flares), and as it is demarcated by a change in texture and pattern, the side flares of the ramp are not required to have a maximum slope of 10%. They are also presenting this as a retrofit condition, and due to the fact that the street gutter flow line and integral curb with block-out were existing, that it would be structurally infeasible to replace the entire corner of curb to become compliant.
I have a photograph of a double perpendicular curb ramp at a 90 degree intersection in the Public Right of Way (PROW) showing the intermediate surface between the two curb ramps as concrete with a pronounced brick pattern. For the most part these ramps are in compliance, however, the side flare slope adjacent to the brick patterned surface exceeds 10% and the DWP alignment exceeds 8” from face of curb, and in our opinion, is therefore non-compliant.

The developer’s engineer is raising the question that the hard surfaced area adjacent to the ramps is not a pedestrian circulation path (R303.2.1.4 Flares), and as it is demarcated by a change in texture and pattern, the side flares of the ramp are not required to have a maximum slope of 10%. They are also presenting this as a retrofit condition, and due to the fact that the street gutter flow line and integral curb with block-out were existing, that it would be structurally infeasible to replace the entire corner of curb to become compliant.