Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
I don't believe there are, but not everything is 'prescriptive'. Some things still need to be designed...
See if R404.1.3.3.7.8 helps. No table or figure, but a nice description of construction joint reinforcement.
R404.1.2 is for masonry walls and never gets to a sub-section as long as you indicate in the 2012 IRC.Correction: R404.1.2.3.7.8
For further information reference ACI 318-11
CorrectThank you. Follow up questions: R404.1.2.3.7.8 has an exception that appears to say you don't need to provide construction joint reinforcement if you're using vertical wall reinforcement at no more than 24" spacing. This doesn't seem to make sense because how does vertical wall reinforcement help tie my new concrete wall to the existing?
Is the bottom line this is an issue that must be designed because there's no prescriptive method?
Is the bottom line this is an issue that must be designed because there's no prescriptive method?
In addition to that you need a Special Inspector to stand by and inspect the epoxy doweling, the residential code diverts to Chapt 17 of the IBC on this, AHJs will not stand by and wait.IMO yes. Need engineer to figure the loads and decide how many, how deep, what kind, strength of epoxy, Etc.