• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Egress travel distance compliance alternative

jar546

jar546

Forum Coordinator
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
11,051
Location
Somewhere Too Hot & Humid
I have a 1.2 million square foot s1 with a small b section. It is brand new and I am involved for the first time for a fit out as a company will occupy part of the facility. I was not here for the initial build of the structure. Most of the exit access travel distances are from 350' to 396'. Section 1016.2 does not apply as the vents are not installed.

I have a report from an engineering firm requesting approval via compliance alternative IBC 104.11. In PA, we did not adopt Chapter 1 but that is another issue.

Anyway, the premise of the alternative to meet the "intent" of the code is that both the large volume of airspace within the facility along with ESFR sprinklers are sufficient. They are stating that the NFPRF and FM have concluded that smoke and heat vents are not cost effective and have an adverse effect on the effect of sprinkler systems.

I am providing you with a basic overview. The submission for Means of Egress Analysis includes timed egress calculations and a comparison analysis of heat release rate and clear height.

I will also post this in the fire section for more responses.

Anyone have any experience with this?
 
Re: Egress travel distance compliance alternative

I do....2.6 million s.f. major retail distribution center. However I was told that I was the first fire authority to ever be involved in the planning meetings and process from footings to acceptance in all their 47 previous ones nationally (at the time back in 2000) :lol:

The corp. did send a very nice letter to our City Admin addrerssing how pleased they were with our involvment and abilities to address these problimatic types of difficult compliance issues.

You may also want to PM "Insurance Engineer" since he has been through many similar type faciliites and will have good insight too.

There is some great information available in Annex C of NFPA 13 and in the Annex's of NFPA 30B regarding the full scale testing that may be of use to you in understanding the reporting you will receive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top