Inspector Gadget
REGISTERED
Wanted to reach out to others on elevation.
Part 3 buildings generally require a design team. The responsibility to correctly place a building - meaning both setbacks from sidelines and the elevation - lies on the architect and, if retained, surveyor. That's a fairly simple answer, and for those of us who use letters of commitment, we can easily outline in the letters of commitment the responsibility to set/verify elevation as one of the key requirements for the design professional.
Our province does not require design professionals for part 9 buildings. Which leads to an interesting question: whose responsibility is it to determine/verify if the elevation of a building is correct? What happens (as an example) if someone builds a little office building, and the drawings show a 6" elevation compared to a municipal sidewalk, with a 6' ramp, but someone bungles the footing/frostwall, and now there's a 9" elevation, leading to potential ramp/access issues.
Part 3 buildings generally require a design team. The responsibility to correctly place a building - meaning both setbacks from sidelines and the elevation - lies on the architect and, if retained, surveyor. That's a fairly simple answer, and for those of us who use letters of commitment, we can easily outline in the letters of commitment the responsibility to set/verify elevation as one of the key requirements for the design professional.
Our province does not require design professionals for part 9 buildings. Which leads to an interesting question: whose responsibility is it to determine/verify if the elevation of a building is correct? What happens (as an example) if someone builds a little office building, and the drawings show a 6" elevation compared to a municipal sidewalk, with a 6' ramp, but someone bungles the footing/frostwall, and now there's a 9" elevation, leading to potential ramp/access issues.