JGM853
REGISTERED
I have a safety concern regarding an accessory building under construction on my neighbors property. I live in OKC, OK and my neighbor poured what I thought to be a patio late 2018. A few months later he began erecting a 30x40 metal shop building on the slab. There was no footing or piers poured. The building just sets on the approximately 3 to 4" concreted slab.
I checked public records and found out that the "Foundation" was rejected by the city. However, permission to erect was granted. I contacted local code enforcement about why the building was allowed on a rejected foundation. I was told that my neighbor had to provide a certification from a licensed engineer stating the slab was built to code and that the city is still waiting on him to obtain the document. Is it normal for construction to be allowed even though the foundation inspection was rejected?
I checked public records and found out that the "Foundation" was rejected by the city. However, permission to erect was granted. I contacted local code enforcement about why the building was allowed on a rejected foundation. I was told that my neighbor had to provide a certification from a licensed engineer stating the slab was built to code and that the city is still waiting on him to obtain the document. Is it normal for construction to be allowed even though the foundation inspection was rejected?