LGreene
Registered User
Because of the requirement for the annual inspection of fire doors, these assemblies are being looked at more closely than ever. One of the most common deficiencies is clearance between the door and frame or between the meeting stiles of pairs that is greater than what is allowed by NFPA 80 (1/8" max. for wood doors, 3/16" max for hollow metal doors). It's important for clearances to be within allowable limits to hinder the spread of smoke and flames, but the cost to replace an entire fire door assembly because the clearance is 1/4" or 5/16" is a tough sell.
A weatherstripping company has asked for my help in finding out whether their proposed solution might be acceptable to code officials. The product is flat (1/16" thick) piece of intumescent that's attached to the frame with adhesive, and expands to seal the gaps when heated. The adhesive is warranteed so it's not a question of whether it will stay put, and it can be combined with smokeseal to control the smoke while the intumescent is heating and expanding.
So, for all the fire marshals / fire inspectors out there, imagine you have a building in your jurisdiction that has 50 rated doors with gaps of 1/4" to 5/16"....
a) Would you consider accepting this solution as an alternative to replacing all of the fire door assemblies, even though NFPA 80 doesn't specifically allow the use of intumescent for non-compliant gaps?
b) What type of testing would you want to see to ensure that the product is acceptable to you?
c) Would you prefer to have smokeseal in addition to the intumescent?
d) What's the largest gap you'd allow this product to seal?
I'm happy to try to answer any questions about the product, and I appreciate your time!
- Lori
A weatherstripping company has asked for my help in finding out whether their proposed solution might be acceptable to code officials. The product is flat (1/16" thick) piece of intumescent that's attached to the frame with adhesive, and expands to seal the gaps when heated. The adhesive is warranteed so it's not a question of whether it will stay put, and it can be combined with smokeseal to control the smoke while the intumescent is heating and expanding.
So, for all the fire marshals / fire inspectors out there, imagine you have a building in your jurisdiction that has 50 rated doors with gaps of 1/4" to 5/16"....
a) Would you consider accepting this solution as an alternative to replacing all of the fire door assemblies, even though NFPA 80 doesn't specifically allow the use of intumescent for non-compliant gaps?
b) What type of testing would you want to see to ensure that the product is acceptable to you?
c) Would you prefer to have smokeseal in addition to the intumescent?
d) What's the largest gap you'd allow this product to seal?
I'm happy to try to answer any questions about the product, and I appreciate your time!
- Lori