Sifu
SAWHORSE
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,326
Given a FSD of 1' for a non-separated, non-sprinklered, VB building containing a B and M occupancy. The B occupancy is adjacent to the exterior wall with the FSD of 1. T602 would require a 1-hr exterior wall rated from both sides (705.5). The M is on the other side, approximately 18' away from the FSD. M would require a 2-hr exterior wall. My thought was that in a non-separated building, the M would be the driver, however as an alternative they could provide a fire barrier to separate the occupancies which would let the B be the driver for t602. I thought it was a viable alternative, but when I look for the rating of that fire barrier to create separated occupancies, t508.4 does not require any separation. So t602 contends that an M is a higher hazard for exterior walls, but t508.4 contends that the hazard is equal.
Or, do I get to use B from t602 since it is the occupancy that is within the FSD? I guess I have never considered how a mixed use building fits in t602.
Or, do I get to use B from t602 since it is the occupancy that is within the FSD? I guess I have never considered how a mixed use building fits in t602.