• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Firefighters Closed Fire Door

LGreene

REGISTERED
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
1,165
Location
San Miguel de Allende, Mexico
Reading this article, I can't help but wonder why firefighters had to close the fire door. Fire doors are supposed to be self-closing or automatic-closing! Is this a common fire-fighting tactic?

http://brainerddispatch.com/news/2014-03-07/fire-rips-through-cross-tech-manufacturing

“We are already starting to make plans to build again,” Freiberg said. Lohmiller said soon after arriving on the scene, a crew was sent in to shut a fire door separating the original plant on the east from a 15,000-square-foot expansion to the west constructed in 2012. With the addition, Cross-Tech stretches across 27,000-square-feet from its original entrance on Gendreau Road to Crow Wing County Highway 3, south of Crosslake.

With the quick work, firefighters were able to save the addition and continued to monitor a corridor connecting the two buildings to keep the fire from spreading.

“They did a good job. They did it,” Freiberg said. “For a tragedy, it worked out as best it could.”
 
Could have been one of those pesky fuseable link released doors.

The ones where door and fuseable link are still in place and buildings burned down. Have not seen it just do not like them
 
I have found many Manufacturing facilities don’t have fusible links, and prop open fire doors to make passage easier between fire areas

Especially in older facilities

Also if the fusible link assembly, or closer, is installed incorrectly, or painted it may prevent the fire door from closing automatically..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.mckeondoor.com/products/retrofit/problems

Testing Difficulty/Improper Reset

Testing difficulties often stem from malfunctions with sash chains and fusible links. Additional malfunctions occur when spring tension is misapplied during installation or conventional resetting procedures.

The Solutions: Auto-Set® Fire Doors are always biased to the closed position. The spring tension is not adjusted and the door is automatically tested and reset. Sash chains are still possible problems with the Auto-Set® System if they are used. However, the Auto-Set® System allows you to connect multiple doors with fusible links without the need for sash chains. In addition, since the magnetic release is an integral part of the operator, the need to connect a remote magnetic release to the fire door with a sash chain is eliminated. Therefore during alarm activations, sash chains are never used.

Inadequate Maintenance

Often, as a result of improper maintenance, fusible links and gears malfunction due to rusting metal parts or paint build-up on gears and sash chains. Under no circumstances should fusible links be painted. Paint thermally insulates the lead in the fusible link and may prevent the link from functioning correctly.

The Auto-Set® Solution: The Auto-Set® System is a low maintenance product. The number of working parts has been radically reduced and incorporated into the Auto-Set® Operator. The mechanical parts which are prone to maintenance problems have been eliminated.

Damage

Damage to fire doors usually results from forklift impact or the improper stacking of heavy warehouse merchandise against the door.

THE AUTO-SET® SOLUTION: Fire doors should be designed to overlap the opening and should be designed in a manner which allows for easy testing and resetting to periodically check for damage, which may not be visible to the eye. The Auto-Set® System is designed for daily testing and resetting. A typical Auto-Set® door takes less than a minute to test and reset.
 
Hot Issue: Maintaining Fire-Rated Doors Facilities mantanance

By Robert Trotter - June 2008

http://www.facilitiesnet.com/doorshardware/article/Hot-Issue-Maintaining-FireRated-Doors--8932#

Hot Issue: Maintaining Fire-Rated Doors

Fire-rated doors are integral components of any passive fire-protection design in the built environment. While occupants and visitors use some of these doors daily, they rarely use other fire doors, which remain held open or closed. Without proper design specifications and comprehensive inspection and maintenance procedures, fire doors that fall into this latter category are significantly less likely to effectively protect the opening.

To protect against the spread of fire and smoke within, into or out of buildings, maintenance and engineering managers need to implement a preventive maintenance program for fire doors in accordance with locally adopted codes and national standards.

Laying Groundwork

While several tragic fires have led to significant revisions to the model codes and standards related to fire doors, building owners and managers continue to neglect inspection and maintenance procedures.

To understand the scope of fire doors, it is important to know these definitions by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the International Code Council. A fire door is the door component of a fire door assembly. This assembly is any combination of a fire door, frame, hardware and other accessories that together provide a specific degree of fire protection to the opening.

Fire doors fall into categories that include: swinging; horizontal sliding; sliding special purpose; vertically sliding; rolling steel; fire shutters; service counter; hoistway doors for elevators and dumbwaiters; chutes; and access. NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code, and the model building codes and fire codes specify the minimum fire-protection rating for fire doors as ranging from 30 minutes to three hours or more.

The NFPA claims failure to close is the most common failure mode of fire doors in actual fires. Contributing factors include: lack of maintenance; physical damage to the closure, door, guides, or tracks; and doorway blockages. Some common faults observed on swinging fire doors include inoperative latches and improperly adjusted closing devices.

Managers cannot ensure reliable fire-door performance unless doorways remain clean and technicians maintain doors in operating condition. Under NFPA 1, the Uniform Fire Code, NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code, and the International Fire Code, organizations must maintain fire doors used to protect openings in walls, floors, and ceilings to prevent or retard the spread of fire and smoke within, into, or out of buildings according to NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives.

The 2007 edition of the NFPA 80 mandates facilities use only labeled fire doors, and a label must be affixed permanently to the door or frame. Doors, shutters and windows must be operable at all times and kept closed and latched or arranged for automatic closing.

When replacing fire doors, shutters, windows or their frames, the glazing materials, hardware, and closing-mechanism replacements must meet the requirements for fire protection and be installed as required by standards for new installations. Also, technicians without delay must make repairs and correct defects that could interfere with operation.

In cases of field modifications to a fire-door assembly, technicians should contact the laboratory whose label is on the assembly and describe the modifications. If the laboratory finds the modifications will not compromise the integrity and assembly’s fire-resistance capabilities, it will authorize the modifications without a field visit.

Testing, Testing

To minimize failures and improve reliability, NFPA 80 states, “Fire door assemblies shall be inspected and tested not less than annually, and a written record of the inspection shall be signed and kept for inspection by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).”

While managers can schedule inspections, testing, and maintenance for fire-door assemblies under a written performance-based program, the goals established under such a program should ensure the assembly will perform as intended when exposed to fire conditions.

Managers need to document the technical justification for inspection, testing, and maintenance intervals. The performance-based option should include historical data acceptable to the AHJ. Individuals with knowledge and understanding of the operating components of the type of door being tested should perform functional testing of fire-door and window assemblies. Before testing, the inspector should perform a visual inspection to identify damaged or missing parts that could create a hazard during testing or affect operation or resetting.

Managers should follow NFPA 80 guidelines for swinging doors with building hardware or fire-door hardware, and visual inspections of fire doors should cover both sides to assess the overall condition of the assembly. As a minimum, inspectors should verify these items:

•No open holes or breaks exist in surfaces of the door or frame.

•Glazing, vision light frames, and glazing beads are intact and securely fastened, if so equipped.

•The door, frame, hinges, hardware, and non-combustible threshold are secured, aligned, and working, with no visible damage.

•No parts are missing or broken.

•Door clearances at the door edge to the frame on the pull side of the door do not exceed 1/8-inch or 3/4-inch undercut.

•The self-closing device works; that is, the active door completely closes when operated from the full open position.

•If a coordinator is in place, the inactive leaf closes before the active leaf.

•Latching hardware operates and secures the door when it is in the closed position.

•The door or frame has no auxiliary hardware items that interfere or prohibit operation.

•The door assembly has no field modifications that void the label.

•Inspections verify the integrity of gasketing and edge seals, where required.

Preventing door blockage is critical to minimizing the spread of fire and smoke. Door openings and the surrounding areas must be clear of anything that could obstruct or interfere with the door’s free operation. Where necessary, technicians should build a barrier to prevent the piling of material against sliding doors. Blocking or wedging doors in the open position must be prohibited.

Closing Thoughts

Proper maintenance of closing mechanisms is equally important in protecting occupants and visitors. NFPA 80 mandates the following:

•Self-closing devices must be in working condition.

•At frequent intervals, operate swinging doors normally held in the open position and equipped with automatic-closing devices to ensure operation.

•Annually inspect and test all horizontal or vertical sliding and rolling fire doors for operation and full closure.

•Reset the release mechanism according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

•Maintain and make available to the AHJ a written record.

•When conducting the annual test for operation and full closure on rolling steel fire doors, perform two drop tests. The first test checks for operation and full closure, and the second test verifies the automatic-closing device has been reset.

•Do not paint fusible links or other heat-actuated devices and release devices.

•Prevent paint from accumulating on movable parts.

The model codes and NFPA 80 offer ample measures for the inspection and maintenance of fire doors, closing devices, latches, and hardware. Many buildings, including high-rises, health care facilities, office buildings, and warehouses are likely to have fire doors. Should a fire occur, the health, safety and welfare of building occupants and emergency responders depend on a proactive, comprehensive fire-door preventive maintenance program.

Robert Trotter, CBO, CFM, is a consultant in regulatory compliance services at Smith Seckman Reid, an engineering design and facility consulting firm. He has 22 years of experience in fire service, including 12 years as Fire Marshal in Franklin, Tenn. He is an NFPA Certified Fire Inspector I and a member of NFPA’s Health Care Section.
 
Why do fire doors fail?

http://www.overheaddoornorthland.com/fire-door-testing/what-are-fire-doors-why-they-fail.html

Like all mechanical products fire doors need periodic inspection and maintenance.

While there can be many reasons why doors fail, we see 4 common situations:

1. First if a fire door is not used on a regular basis, people may not be aware it is a fire door or even a door if it is in place only as a fire door. Overtime, with little or no care paid to the door or the opening, the door will not close properly. We have seen where, in ignorance, the door rails are blocked by brooms, barrels, buckets and other items stored in the doorway preventing the door from closing.

So over time the guide rails may be painted or damaged. Or people put things in the doorway preventing the door from closing.

2. The fire door opening is a main traffic path and therefore the guide rails of the door a subject to repeated damage. Guide rails get bumped, bent, and knocked out of alignment by fork lifts, lift trucks, and carts during the course of a normal day. The problem can come from the cumulative effects of several incidents or from one significant incident.

Please note that it is not possible to visually tell if the damage is severe enough to prevent proper functioning of the door. The door must be drop tested.

3. If the doors are used on a regular basis, say to close off an area at night, the door may close enough for security reasons but not adequately to choke off a fire. Operators and maintenance people may not be aware that a fire door needs to close properly not just go up and down.

4. Doors are damaged as part of building maintenance. Ironically, often well maintained buildings have a problem with fire doors. Well meaning painters will often paint (over spray) the hardware of the fire door. Paint on the Release Device of a fire door can be enough to prevent it from closing or closing properly. Paint on the fusible link or release devices changes its thermal properties thus making them inoperative.
 
So...everyone knows fire doors are prone to being propped open, malfunctioning over time, etc., and a fire door that does not function properly can have a major impact during a fire (for example, the Sofa Superstore fire), so why are AHJs so reluctant to enforce the annual inspection requirements for fire doors and egress doors? The IFC references NFPA 80 for maintenance of fire doors, and NFPA 80 requires fire doors to be inspected annually, with documentation of the inspection kept for review by the AHJ. NFPA 101 has more specific requirements for annual inspections of fire doors and some egress doors.

Why aren't AHJs using the inspection requirements as a tool to at least address buildings where fire door maintenance is obviously lacking? I really want to know. I'm asking with regard to swinging doors too, not just the rolling fire doors. Collecting a bucket of wood wedges during an inspection does not have a lasting impact. Either we agree that fire doors are an important part of compartmentalizing a building and use the tools we have to make sure they're in proper working order, or we continue to ignore them until tragedy strikes (again).
 
1. lack of knowledge on NFPA 80

2. how to start enforcement of NFPA 80 with building owners
 
Cost of the inspection program. Most FD run out of the general fund and if you start charging inspections fees for fire prevention programs it is perceived by the business/building owners as a revenue source and a "tax" Although there is a service provide for the inspection fee it is not a voluntary inspection or required as part of a building project or special event event.

All the written laws and codes in the world are useless to everyone unless there is some type of oversight and enforcement,

Sure NFPA 80 and fire door inspection requirement is a good and thoughtful idea, The problem is it will be a tool used by the attorneys in wrongful death suits. In General the majority of AHJ's are not required by code or law to conduct fire prevention inspections or enforce the maintenance provisions of NFPA 80.
 
cda said:
1. lack of knowledge on NFPA 802. how to start enforcement of NFPA 80 with building owners
1. I'll tell you all about it. :D

2. How about starting with certain types of occupancies, or buildings where the fire doors are in particularly bad shape?
 
mtlogcabin said:
Cost of the inspection program. Most FD run out of the general fund and if you start charging inspections fees for fire prevention programs it is perceived by the business/building owners as a revenue source and a "tax" Although there is a service provide for the inspection fee it is not a voluntary inspection or required as part of a building project or special event event.All the written laws and codes in the world are useless to everyone unless there is some type of oversight and enforcement,

Sure NFPA 80 and fire door inspection requirement is a good and thoughtful idea, The problem is it will be a tool used by the attorneys in wrongful death suits. In General the majority of AHJ's are not required by code or law to conduct fire prevention inspections or enforce the maintenance provisions of NFPA 80.
There is no expectation that the fire marshal would be responsible for inspecting every door. If the building owner has a knowledgeable person on staff, they can inspect their own doors. There are Intertek-certified fire door inspectors who can conduct inspections for a fee. There are training programs to help teach people who are not at the certification level on what to look for. Yes, there is some effort or cost involved, but doing nothing has not worked very well.

In most jurisdictions, certain types of occupancies are required to be inspected periodically, right? When the AHJ arrives for the inspection, he or she may ask to see the sprinkler certificate, may check the fire extinguisher tags, and ask for certification that the hood has been cleaned by a qualified person. Why not ask to see documentation of a fire door inspection? Even if an employee of the facility took a little time to learn what to look for, looked at the doors, documented what was found, and fixed the problems, we'd be way ahead of the current situation.

Non-compliant fire doors and egress doors may be used by attorneys and insurance companies regardless of whether a fire door inspection was done. But if a fire door inspection brought to light the fact that a fire door wasn't self-closing, and then the closer was repaired, the outcome may be different.
 
LG

IF I remember correctly and now you are going make me read again your door inspection write ups,

But from above replies your normal swinging fire door inspection is a visual and function test.

Now, I do normally do those. Look at the condition of the door, open it and see if it closes and latches, if on door holder see it release and close, if a pair make sure both close and latch.

If any problems noted for correction

Is it nfpa 80 close??

Like with other nfpa standards sometimes hard to get every detail done
 
Reading this article, I can't help but wonder whyfirefighters had to close the fire door. Fire doors are supposed to beself-closing or automatic-closing! Is this a common fire-fightingtactic?
This apparently was an owner's quote or third party accounting and I personally don't hold too much stock in it. Regardless, there could have been manyfactors involved if the firefighters actually had to force closed a designedfire rated door (debris, faulty equipment etc.).



In most jurisdictions, certain types of occupancies are required to beinspected periodically, right? When the AHJ arrives for the inspection, he orshe may ask to see the sprinkler certificate, may check the fireextinguisher tags, and ask for certification that the hood has been cleanedby a qualified person. Why not ask to see documentation of a fire doorinspection?
Here is where the rubber meets the road. Yes, anyone doing inspections regardless ofwho for or for what reason should require operational documentation oflisted/required and rated fire door assemblies or they are not performing theirjob…period.

Maintenance requirements have existed in 80 dating backto library (1992) and the owner of the door is responsible and the AHJ has historicallybeen responsible to determine at what the level repairs, maintenance and orreplacement of parts etc. Those responsibleto verify the functionality and operations (AHJ) whether that be a municipalityor institution or door/parts manufacturer or all have a responsibility toverify they work when inspecting an occupancy having such equipment.
 
cda said:
LG IF I remember correctly and now you are going make me read again your door inspection write ups,

But from above replies your normal swinging fire door inspection is a visual and function test.

Now, I do normally do those. Look at the condition of the door, open it and see if it closes and latches, if on door holder see it release and close, if a pair make sure both close and latch.

If any problems noted for correction

Is it nfpa 80 close??

Like with other nfpa standards sometimes hard to get every detail done
NFPA 80 has either 11 or 13 inspection criteria, depending on which version. Here is the list from the 2013 edition:

(1) Labels are clearly visible and legible.

(2) No open holes or breaks exist in surfaces of either the door or frame.

(3) Glazing, vision light frames, and glazing beads are intact and securely fastened in place, if so equipped.

(4) The door, frame, hinges, hardware, and noncombustible threshold are secured, aligned, and in working order with no visible signs of damage.

(5) No parts are missing or broken.

(6) Door clearances do not exceed clearances listed in 4.8.4 and 6.3.1.7.

(7) The self-closing device is operational; that is, the active door completely closes when operated from the full open position.

(8) If a coordinator is installed, the inactive leaf closes before the active leaf.

(9) Latching hardware operates and secures the door when it is in the closed position.

(10) Auxiliary hardware items that interfere or prohibit operation are not installed on the door or frame.

(11) No field modifications to the door assembly have been performed that void the label.

(12) Meeting edge protection, gasketing and edge seals, where required, are inspected to verify their presence and integrity.

(13) Signage affixed to a door meets the requirements listed in 4.1.4.
 
Firefighters Closed Fire Door

The reason I don't do these inspections LGreene is because in PA the state took out all the maintenance requirements in the IFC. We don't check sprinklers or anything once they have a C O.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rick18071 said:
The reason I don't do these inspections LGrenne is because in PA the state took out all the maintenance requirements in the IFC. We don't check sprinklers or anything once they have a C O.
Sad, worked a city like that once and seems they had more fires
 
cda said:
Sad, worked a city like that once and seems they had more fires
More fires was not caused by lack of maintenance of fire prevention items.

Contribute to the size and loss of life and property but never the cause of the fires.
 
mtlogcabin said:
More fires was not caused by lack of maintenance of fire prevention items. Contribute to the size and loss of life and property but never the cause of the fires.
I would disagree with this statement. Annual inspections for other fire issues gets the inspector in the door. Once they are inside they may be able to identify future threats and recommend changes to the business owners. Not all officials would do this and even then you are relying on a business owner to see their side of it in order to change something, but some fire would still be avoided.
 
Once they are inside they may be able to identify future threats
I stand by my statement. Fires are not a result of poor maintenance of a fire door or sprinkler system, or detection system or breach in a fire barrier.

Fires are a result of improper housekeeping or activities within or outside of the the structure.

I agree once inside an inspector can and should identify the potential threats and have them corrected. This would even be done in structures that do not have fire doors, sprinklers or anything else that may require maintenance
 
You can have all the codes in the world but they won't do jack about the factory worker propping the door open for convenience. I agree with mt above...fire is not caused by a propped-open fire door. Fire made worse...yes.
 
TJacobs said:
You can have all the codes in the world but they won't do jack about the factory worker propping the door open for convenience. I agree with mt above...fire is not caused by a propped-open fire door. Fire made worse...yes.
I think that annual inspections with a focus on fire doors would help to educate that factory worker, or at least the facility manager. Generally, people don't know that it's not ok to prop open a fire door. There is one message that is taught and remembered about fire...the other day I was talking to my 9YO son about what to do if he heard the smoke alarm at home. His answer, "Stop, Drop, and Roll." There is a lot of opportunity for education and increased awareness. Not everyone reads iDigHardware.com. Yet. :)
 
I also think that some remedial traingin may be in store for your son ---- a smoke alarm means to use EDITH...... EXIT DRILLS IN THE HOUSE....

Stop, drop, roll is what you do when your clothes catch on fire....

Yes opportunities are there .... but the person has to be willing to learn.
 
PS...I apologize for the running on of words in previous posing. The Quick Reply tool causes word entry to not complete properly and continually calls for spell check even when proper key strokes are made. I wonder if it is a setting or something because I'm not a Sawhorse???

FIRE PREVENTION IS A COMMUNITY'S OBIGATION FOR RISK REDUCTION!
 
Back
Top