• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

First Fix, Then Fight

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,895
Location
So. CA
RICHARD M. HUNT

http://accessdefense.com/?page_id=538

First Fix, Then Fight is a slogan and a philosophy for the defense of ADA and FHA lawsuits. It is also the most practical approach to the defense of such claims. Sooner or later, almost every owner of a commercial or multi-family residential property will receive a demand letter or be served with a lawsuit claiming violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act or Fair Housing Act accessibility standards. Although the accessibility standards are now more than 20 years old, accessibility lawsuits continue to increase, and surveys indicate that almost all commercial and multi-family properties have some accessibility violations.

Accessibility lawsuits are always irksome. Most businesses try to comply with the ADA and FHA, and getting sued over a handful of minor violations seems unfair. Nonetheless, a strategy based on remediation rather than an aggressive litigation response is almost aways the most sensible response to an accessibility claim. The accessibility guidelines are generally objective, and a complaint that a doorway is too narrow or a ramp is too steep is probably true. The ADA requires remediation of all barriers to access if readily achievable, and provides for attorneys’ fees for prevailing plaintiffs. Most ADA violations can be fixed at modest expense, so the legal fees incurred fighting over whether to remediate may exceed the cost of remediation. Courts have awarded hundreds of thousands of dollars to plaintiffs’ attorneys who demanded complete remediation even when the barriers to be remediated were few in number and cheap to fix. Why? Because the law requires remediation, and the property owner who resisted remediation was seen as the unreasonable party responsible for the increased fees.

Take control of the issues by finding and fixing any real ADA or FHA violations so that they can bargain from a position of strength. We negotiate with opposing counsel from a position of knowledge about both the law and the usual costs of settlement — market knowledge that comes only with experience.

First Fix, Then Fight.
 
So true but sadly you are preaching to the choir.

Those who "need to know" continue to be/ plead ignorance of the law.
 
Back
Top