• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

High Rise 1982 Construction Dryer Vent & Kitchen Hood Sharing Same exhaust stack

jar546

Forum Coordinator
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
10,977
Location
Somewhere Too Hot & Humid
It was recently uncovered that during a kitchen stove vent replacement that is was filled with dryer lint. It is believed that there is a cross connection either by accident or by design between the kitchen stack & dryer vent stack, which may be one single stack being used for both. Certainly a violation of today's mechanical code IMC 504.10 but the real question is whether this was covered under an old NFPA standard when the building was constructed. The stack is all drywall with no pipe whatsoever as required by today's standards.

How would your jurisdiction handle this if this was an official complaint brought to you by a contractor? This can be a serious fire hazard.

Thoughts?
 
It was recently uncovered that during a kitchen stove vent replacement that is was filled with dryer lint. It is believed that there is a cross connection either by accident or by design between the kitchen stack & dryer vent stack, which may be one single stack being used for both. Certainly a violation of today's mechanical code IMC 504.10 but the real question is whether this was covered under an old NFPA standard when the building was constructed. The stack is all drywall with no pipe whatsoever as required by today's standards.

How would your jurisdiction handle this if this was an official complaint brought to you by a contractor? This can be a serious fire hazard.

Thoughts?
Is this a commercial hood for a hotel, or a normal residential hood for an apartment?
 
[A] 116.1 Unsafe conditions. Structures or existing equipment
that are or hereafter become unsafe, insanitary or
deficient because of inadequate means of egress facilities,
inadequate light and ventilation, or that constitute a fire
hazard, or are otherwise dangerous to human life or the
public welfare, or that involve illegal or improper occupancy
or inadequate maintenance, shall be deemed an unsafe
condition.


I wouldn't do it lightly....But I might do it...
 
I would pursue having this corrected through what means available. Not familiar with American codes...but it may save a life.
 
Dug out the old 1982 UMC from our library. There were no provisions for common shafting of domestic clothes dryers. Ducts were required to meet the dryer manufacturer's instructions and to be exhausted to the outside if in an area that was habitable. Nothing specific about combining with other exhaust systems, but I'm guessing no domestic dryer manufacturer ever covers common venting in a shaft or allows it to be connected to other types of systems.

The I-codes didn't allow it until 2009.

I'm with Steveray on probably considering this an unsafe condition. Dryer exhaust can be a fire hazard even when installed correctly
 
It is a dangerous condition that’s complicated by the fact that you’re dealing with however many units there are and a HOA. Dryer vents are a particular concern …. adding cooking vapors to lint makes it worse. That must make for a nasty mess as well.

Perhaps the Fire Department will get on board. An argument that might be presented for ignoring the situation is that the condition has existed for a long time with no problems. Tell that to the victims of the condo collapse.
 
Top