jar546 said:
A hotel room without cooking provisions is not a dwelling unit, therefore tamper resistant receptacles are not required. Am I correct?
Chapter 4 Equipment for General Use :: ARTICLE 406 Receptacles, Cord Connectors, and Attachment Plugs (Caps)
406.12 Tamper-Resistant Receptacles for Dwelling Units.
In all areas specified in 210.52, all nonlocking-type 125-volt, 15- and 20-ampere receptacles shall be listed tamper-resistant receptacles.
Exception: Receptacles in the following locations shall not be required to be tamper-resistant:
Changed From 2008
•tabspacer 406.12 & Exception: Revised to specify that the requirement applies to “nonlocking” type receptacles and to add a new exception providing specific conditions under which receptacles are not required to be tamper-resistant
(1) Receptacles located more than 1.7 m (5½ ft) above the floor.
(2) Receptacles that are part of a luminaire or appliance.
(3) A single receptacle or a duplex receptacle for two appliances located within dedicated space for each appliance that, in normal use, is not easily moved from one place to another and that is cord-and-plug connected in accordance with 400.7(A)(6), (A)(7), or (A)(8).
(4) Nongrounding receptacles used for replacements as permitted in 406.4(D)(2)(a).
Only other requirement 517.18 ©
© Pediatric Locations. Receptacles located within the rooms, bathrooms, playrooms, activity rooms, and patient care areas of designated pediatric locations shall be listed tamper resistant or shall employ a listed tamper-resistant cover