• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

House of worship & ADA

tbz

tbz

REGISTERED
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
1,361
Location
PA/NJ - Borderlands
Looking for clarification of my understanding. And section numbers.

Front of a church, existing landing to sidewalk, redoing the ramp.

Please correct me if I am wrong here,

My understanding is that the church is exempt from the ADA-DOJ?

however the church is not exempt from the AHJ building code requirements?

Thus, the ramp would need to comply with the adopted 2009 IBC & ANSI A117.1 code & standard that the state adopted.

But, is exempt from ADA,

I am hoping for detailed clarification on this with ADA section for exempt, if I am correct or not.

Thanks in advance

Tom
 
I totally agree that no ADA is enforced, but since current codes are very closely aligned with ADA, there isn't too much in favor of non-conformance of ADA.

Most churches are concerned with the mobility of their members. My church did an accessibility upgrade back in the early '90's as a project all on it's own. Included a raised (to floor level) bus drop off that is covered from the elements, added ramps where steps existed (had to sawcut existing concrete beam - thankfully it was oversized at that location) and family accessible toilet rooms. Existing toilet rooms would have been severely impacted to try and bring those up to clearance requirements.
 
28 CFR Part 36 July 1, 1994. Subpart A, 36.102 (e) Is where you find the ADA exemption. If the jurisdiction has adopted the ANSI A-117.1 then they must comply to that standard.
 
Maybe, Maybe not

Equal Access Exemption for Churches

Title III of the ADA mandates that "no individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation." To comply with this provision, a public accommodation must remove barriers to the full access and enjoyment of its facilities.

The equal access provisions of ADA, however, do not apply to religious organizations or places of worship operated by religious organizations. Churches, therefore, are exempt from ADA coverage and do not have to remove barriers to the access or enjoyment of any church accommodations including auditoriums, nursery schools and daycare centers. The exemption applies whether the church activities are religious or secular. Rationale for the Church Exemption

The equal access exemption for religious institutions has been upheld by courts on the basis that requiring religious entities to comply with the ADA and allowing the government to initiate enforcement proceedings against religious entities would amount to an impermissible government interference with religion. As explained by the federal court in Chipkevich v. University of Scranton, exempting religious entities from the ADA's equal access provisions allows them "to design their facilities and perform their services in accordance with their religious tenets." Church Facilities Operated by Nonreligious Entities

The equal access exemption for churches does not extend to nonreligious entities that rent facilities owned by or located within the church. Nonreligious entities must comply with the hiring and equal access provisions of the ADA if they operate public accommodations in inaccessible facilities rented or leased from the church. If the nonreligious entity is operating in a space donated by the church, however, it is exempt from the ADA's requirements.
 
Given that churches are free to discriminate on the basis of sex, ethnicity, skin color, sexual orientation, country of origin and - lest we forget - religion; why would you find it surprising that they are allowed to discriminate against the disabled?
 
Thanks everyone for input I will explain more.

1. This access is only to the front place of worship (the church) which is why I noted place of worship and not church.

2. I was asked by a fellow fabricator if they put lambs tongue ends over the last post do they comply with the 27" height portion of the code, which my answer was, as long as they stayed within 4" of the post edge.

3. However, he was asking me noting ADA, my answer was that the house of worship was exempt from ADA, but not the local AHJ's building code, nor A117.1 if adopted which would be inline with ADA.

4. The other noted point was that the designer was removing the 12" Plus level extensions from the bottom of the ramp because they protrude in to the public walkway.

I noted to the fabricator that I don't know if the extensions could be removed pending adopted code and how the AHJ classified the work. If this was all new and the AHJ does not put this in renovation that the removal of the extension could be non-compliance.

I will note that I believe this installation is in IOWA, a little bit of a drive from NJ unless you are "Frank & MIKE - AP".

So I started with the basic question confirming ADA non-issue, but local building codes are an issue.

So, how do you all see or should I say handle the extensions protruding in to the public sidewalk?

Thanks for your input.
 
I agree that ADA would not apply unless the space is used for non-church purposes - -including community meetings, polling places, boy scout troop ceremonies, etc.

Also agree that the local accessibility code still has jurisdiction.

As to your handrail extenion question - "paging mark handler" - it is my understanding that the recent changes to ADA have removed the extension where they create a hazard. Need someone else to (a) confirm that statement, and if so, then (b) see if your local code has caught up this ADA change.
 
Yikes said:
I agree that ADA would not apply unless the space is used for non-church purposes - -including community meetings, polling places, boy scout troop ceremonies, etc.Also agree that the local accessibility code still has jurisdiction.

As to your handrail extenion question - "paging mark handler" - it is my understanding that the recent changes to ADA have removed the extension where they create a hazard. Need someone else to (a) confirm that statement, and if so, then (b) see if your local code has caught up this ADA change.
Click to expand...
None of those uses would require a church building to be ADA compliant - however the outside organizations utilizing the building might be obliged to provide accessibility...but not in the case of the Boy Scouts due to their religious affiliation.
 
Never ceases to amaze me their higher calling? Sorry about the comment but still... One has to wonder? Good luck.

Post Script: Make them do the 12" extentions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does not apply to churches but most will go out of their way to get those old disabled folks through the front door. Its a money thing.
 
jpranch said:
Never ceases to amaze me their higher calling? Sorry about the comment but still... One has to wonder? Good luck. Post Script: Make them do the 12" extentions.
Click to expand...
If I understand correctly, it's a retrofit on an existing building. The ramp will work but the extensions will make it dangeroous in the public ROW. I hope there's some flexibility with the AHJ to try and make it work.

Can you return the handrails to they don't protrude?
 
RE: House of Worship & ADA

brudgers said:
None of those uses would require a church building to be ADA compliant - however the outside organizations utilizing the building might be obliged to provide accessibility...but not in the case of the Boy Scouts due to their religious affiliation.
Click to expand...
A polling place wouldn't be required to be accessible???
 
incognito said:
Does not apply to churches but most will go out of their way to get those old disabled folks through the front door. Its a money thing.
Click to expand...
Actually, its a fraternal thing.

The ADA also exempts certain fraternal organizations; like the Boy Scouts, VFW and Masons. The reasoning is that in fraternal organizations - be they religious or not - the membership will take care of their own.

(Given the way most churches are on Sunday mornings though its a wonder anyone ever got that idea.)

Anyway, I agree with the comments. For a place of worship - no ADA; yes AHJ. If a day care is provided or the place is used as a poling place, then access is required - or barrier removal since its an existing facility.
 
Darren Emery said:
A polling place wouldn't be required to be accessible???
Click to expand...
A polling place would probably be required to be accessible, but the responsibility for accessibility is with the government entity responsible for running the election not the place of worship serving as polling place. In other words, if the polling place is inaccessible the government could be sued and for many facilities the owner of the facility could be sued as well. But when the polling place is a house of worship, it is hard to see how they would fall under any portion of ADA. Of course, having a polling place at a house of worship is problematic enough from a first amendment standpoint.
 
The handrail extensions at the top and bottom runs of stairs and ramps must extend in the direction of travel. You cannot return them at the bottom riser or toe of the ramp. I am not addressing the turn at a intermediate landing but the last top and last bottom of the run. I could look up and quote the section if asked.

I also thought that the Churches were not exempt from the Building Code. Are we stating here that the courts have bascially stated the AHJ has no jurisdiction on churches regarding accessibility?
 
Examiner, Churches are not exempt from the building code, they are exempt from ADA regs unless of course they open their doors to events that are not church related.

Gene Boecker, No it is a money thing. They often elect to provide ADA accomodations so they can get the elderly--and their cash--into the building. Not bad thing, just makes good business sense.
 
incognito said:
Examiner, Churches are not exempt from the building code, they are exempt from ADA regs unless of course they open their doors to events that are not church related.Gene Boecker, No it is a money thing. They often elect to provide ADA accomodations so they can get the elderly--and their cash--into the building. Not bad thing, just makes good business sense.
Click to expand...
Places of Worship are exempt from ADA even if they hold events which are not church related - however any secular organizations responsible for those events are not exempt.
 
They won't get sued under ADA (the whole separation of church/state thing), but they need to comply with the minimum requirements of the building code (which includes A117, as incorporated by reference).

IF the building is used for any public purpose, they will be a DOJ target for ADA..

just sayin'
 
peach said:
They won't get sued under ADA (the whole separation of church/state thing), but they need to comply with the minimum requirements of the building code (which includes A117, as incorporated by reference).IF the building is used for any public purpose, they will be a DOJ target for ADA..

just sayin'
Click to expand...
No. The facility is still a place of worship and exempt from ADA. Similarly, to the way in which a church bookstore is allowed to discriminate against atheists during the hiring process.
 
Section 36.102(e) states that the rule does not apply to any private club, religious entity, or public entity.

Religious entity means a religious organization, including a place of worship.

Even when a religious organization carries out activities that would othervise make it a public accommodation, the religious organization is exempt from ADA coverage. Thus, if a church itself operates a day care center, a nursing home, a private school, or a diocesan school system, the operations of the center, home, school, or schools would not be subject to the requirements of the ADA or this part. The religious entity would not lose its exemption merely because the services provided were open to the general public. The test is whether the church or other religious organization operates the public accommodation, not which individuals receive the public accommodation's services.

Although a religious organization or a religious entity that is controlled by a religious organization has no obligations under the rule, a public accommodation that is not itself a religious organization, but that operates a place of public accommodation in leased space on the property of a religious entity, which is not a place of worship, is subject to the rule's requirements if it is not under control of a religious organization. When a church rents meeting space, which is not a place of worship, to a local community group or to a private, independent day care center, the ADA applies to the activities of the local community group and day care center if a lease exists and consideration is paid.

http://www.ada.gov/reg3a.html

Yes, the church is not exempt from the AHJ building code requirements.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top