Mslacat
REGISTERED
I hope this is in the correct forum
I need some opinions on this question. My partner and I, both architects, are assessing a rehabilitation project and have a difference of opinion regarding its classification under the IEBC, specifically the definition stipulating "50% of the building to be renovated."
Here is a brief project overview: The building, constructed in 1978, is a three-story structure comprising 60 apartments, offices, and common spaces. Since its construction, it has undergone only routine maintenance and lacks a major renovation. The budget for the project is $5 million. Our proposed renovations encompass the replacement of flooring, cabinets, plumbing and lighting fixtures, appliances, windows, doors/hardware, electric baseboards, and water heaters in each apartment. Additionally, we plan to add a PTAC and HRV to each unit. We also plan on adding a fire sprinkler system to the building, enhance insulation, re-roof, replace some siding, and repoint some brick on the exterior. We also will perform site maintenance, including the repair of sidewalks (only 10 years old). As part of the actual construction, three apartments will be gutted and rebuilt as fully accessible units, and the installation of a soffit/chase for HRV ducts and plumbing for the fire sprinkler system in every apartment.
My partner asserts that this project surpasses the 50% threshold for building renovation, triggering additional requirements. However, I am uncertain. While I acknowledge that we are touching the entire building, I perceive the majority of the work as replacement and maintenance rather than new construction. I believe the 50% rule is more related to substantial construction and, in some instances, the building's value.
We are preparing to present our findings to the owners. If the 50% rule is applicable, adjustments will be required in each apartment to ensure full compliance with current code requirements. This could substantially increase both construction and tenant relocation costs. Your insights on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
I would really appreciate any opinions or comments
.
I need some opinions on this question. My partner and I, both architects, are assessing a rehabilitation project and have a difference of opinion regarding its classification under the IEBC, specifically the definition stipulating "50% of the building to be renovated."
Here is a brief project overview: The building, constructed in 1978, is a three-story structure comprising 60 apartments, offices, and common spaces. Since its construction, it has undergone only routine maintenance and lacks a major renovation. The budget for the project is $5 million. Our proposed renovations encompass the replacement of flooring, cabinets, plumbing and lighting fixtures, appliances, windows, doors/hardware, electric baseboards, and water heaters in each apartment. Additionally, we plan to add a PTAC and HRV to each unit. We also plan on adding a fire sprinkler system to the building, enhance insulation, re-roof, replace some siding, and repoint some brick on the exterior. We also will perform site maintenance, including the repair of sidewalks (only 10 years old). As part of the actual construction, three apartments will be gutted and rebuilt as fully accessible units, and the installation of a soffit/chase for HRV ducts and plumbing for the fire sprinkler system in every apartment.
My partner asserts that this project surpasses the 50% threshold for building renovation, triggering additional requirements. However, I am uncertain. While I acknowledge that we are touching the entire building, I perceive the majority of the work as replacement and maintenance rather than new construction. I believe the 50% rule is more related to substantial construction and, in some instances, the building's value.
We are preparing to present our findings to the owners. If the 50% rule is applicable, adjustments will be required in each apartment to ensure full compliance with current code requirements. This could substantially increase both construction and tenant relocation costs. Your insights on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
I would really appreciate any opinions or comments
.