Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
The property line for the building itself not the individual units on a case like that you have to consider the building as a whole, not the individual units. Your deed is for the unit itself and there is no indication of the property lines on it.What about “air rights” and underground minerals? I suppose the PL continues but its like an easement. What about a second floor condo that is larger or smaller than the the one below.
While the individual condo owner has some rights to an individual unit it is the Condo association that owns the building.The property line for the building itself not the individual units on a case like that you have to consider the building as a whole, not the individual units. Your deed is for the unit itself and there is no indication of the property lines on it.
I've never seen it in writing but I always assumed it also went down since I know footings from a neighboring structure cannot cross the property line.Thanks all for the responses thus far! Follow up question: since the imaginary property line concept is utilized for building code compliance (e.g. fire separation distance, opening percentage, etc), should it be assumed that this P/L continues below grade in the same location or is it applicable to above grade conditions only?