• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Licensed Architect vs. Homeowner's "own" plans

M

matatat

REGISTERED
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
20
Location
New York City
Hi all,

General question here that I am hoping to get a little better understanding on with how this typically works from building department insiders.

I have had a few recent building departments in NJ and VA, among others, tell me that if the homeowner is providing their own plans, then they do not need to be signed and sealed by a professionally licensed architect or engineer. But if a designer is preparing the plans for them, then they need to be a licensed professional in those states. Why this distinction? Is there anything keeping an unlicensed architect from giving unmarked plans to the homeowner with no "designer" indicated, and then having them file for a permit? I understand the risk to the homeowner, but if it is not required for all plans to be submitted by licensed professionals, then why have this dual standard? And would a building department notice that unmarked plans were prepared by a professional, and then ask for them to be resubmitted after being signed and sealed?
 
Not my area but

For new house or remodel work??



Well more than likely you can buy very good plans off the internet


https://www.thehousedesigners.com/plan/lattesa-di-vita-1895/

Their disclaimer::


Additional Engineering/State Stamp
In some regions, there is another step you will need to take to insure your house plans are in compliance with local codes. Despite our all-inclusive structure on our plans, some areas of North America have additional engineering requirements. It is possible you will need to hire a State licensed structural engineer to analyze the design and provide additional drawings and calculations required by your local building department. Examples of this would be, but not limited to,

  • Earthquake-prone areas of California and the Pacific Coast
  • Hurricane risk areas like Florida and the Gulf States
  • Carolinas and Atlantic Coast
  • New York, New Jersey, Nevada and sections of Illinois
If you aren’t sure, building departments typically have a handout listing all of the items they require to submit to obtain a building permit.

Additionally, stock plans do not have a professional stamp attached. If your building department requires one, they will only accept a stamp from a professional licensed in the state where you plan to build. In this case, you will need to take your house plans to a local engineer or architect for review and stamping. In addition, plans which are used to construct homes in Nevada are required to be drawn by a licensed Nevada architect.
 
mark handler said:
Legally there is no such thing as a unlicensed architect
Click to expand...
What about a licensed architect, but not licensed in that state? What if someone is licensed in New York, wants to do a project in New Jersey. The building department says that the homeowner can provide their "own plans", or the plans of a professionally licensed architect in that state? Do they need to get a New Jersey reciprocal license just to submit, or can the homeowner submit them as their own plans? Or are they encouraging the architect to give their plans to another NJ architect to sign and seal, even though that is questionable ethically?
 
cda said:
Not my area but

For new house or remodel work??



Well more than likely you can buy very good plans off the internet


https://www.thehousedesigners.com/plan/lattesa-di-vita-1895/

Their disclaimer::


Additional Engineering/State Stamp
In some regions, there is another step you will need to take to insure your house plans are in compliance with local codes. Despite our all-inclusive structure on our plans, some areas of North America have additional engineering requirements. It is possible you will need to hire a State licensed structural engineer to analyze the design and provide additional drawings and calculations required by your local building department. Examples of this would be, but not limited to,

  • Earthquake-prone areas of California and the Pacific Coast
  • Hurricane risk areas like Florida and the Gulf States
  • Carolinas and Atlantic Coast
  • New York, New Jersey, Nevada and sections of Illinois
If you aren’t sure, building departments typically have a handout listing all of the items they require to submit to obtain a building permit.

Additionally, stock plans do not have a professional stamp attached. If your building department requires one, they will only accept a stamp from a professional licensed in the state where you plan to build. In this case, you will need to take your house plans to a local engineer or architect for review and stamping. In addition, plans which are used to construct homes in Nevada are required to be drawn by a licensed Nevada architect.
Click to expand...
Good point with the online plans! This is for a renovation, so maybe they meant "own plans" in terms of something like this. However, it is strange for me that it would not just be a requirement that all plans need to be signed and sealed by a licensed professional in that state before submission, like many of the New York building departments say.
 
The old adage that "a man's home is his castle" is adhered to by the building code. It is written in such away that if followed without exceeding the minimums most residences can be "drawn" by a homeowner or a draftsman. The out of state architect would have to offer services as only a draftsman not as a state licensed architect.
If you have a need to exceed code span tables or window areas then the signature of an engineer in some states is permissible in lieu of an architect.
Everyone wants to be an architect and or to undercut them. Consider working with a design/build contractor?
If you still chose to go it without a professional be prepared for a difficult time with some jurisdictions, they are required to accept your plans but not approve them until they are "complete".

Have you got the time and patience to do so?
 
Here....If the plans are not required to be stamped, they are not required to be stamped no matter who draws them...Pretty simple. I am sure their laws are similar, maybe FV will chime in on VA.
 
Same as steveray here. We do say in our building by-law that the plans must be drawn by a competent professional, but generally we determine that a competent professional is someone who can provide us sufficiently detailed plans to confirm basic code compliance. In that regard, it's not about who draws the plans, but the quality of the plans.

Having received some questionable plans from architects and engineers lately, we have set minimum submission standards for them as well.
 
VA could be like Colorado, inasmuch as CO requires Plumbers and Electricians to be licensed by the State, but if a person wants to do their own plumbing or electrical for their own primary residence, it is allowed.
 
We do not require a stamp on residential plans as long as they do not exceed the scope of the IRC. I wonder if maybe the requirement you are referring to is related to the possibility that if someone "sells" themselves as an architect or professional designer then there is an expectation that they will provide a code compliant, safe design. And if that expectation exists and the owners rely on it they are potentially in harms way if the designer is not competent. Similar to the expectation that a licensed contractor will know more than a homeowner, therefore the homeowner relies on the contractor to build a safe structure.
 
From the Code of Virginia:

§ 54.1-402. Further exemptions from license requirements for architects, professional engineers, and land surveyors.

A. No license as an architect or professional engineer shall be required pursuant to § 54.1-406 for persons who prepare plans, specifications, documents and designs for the following, provided any such plans, specifications, documents or designs bear the name and address of the author and his occupation:

1. Single- and two-family homes, townhouses and multifamily dwellings, excluding electrical and mechanical systems, not exceeding three stories;

I guess that an out-of-state architect could design a house for somebody in Virginia as long as he didn't use his regular titleblock. I don't know whether listing his occupation as "house designer" or similar would be considered fraudulent. His professional liability insurance wouldn't cover him, and he would be open to much more potential liability because an attorney would establish that he was an architect, and therefore more knowledgeable than a draftsman. I'm not sure whether many architects would want to go there.
 
ADAguy said:
That would be great to visit but we are coming down from Hershey and Gettysburg after visiting Niagra Falls with my bride.
Click to expand...


NFA is only ten miles from the battlefield.

Plus there is Ott's in Emmitsburg, which is a must
 
Yes we are, Dinner in the observation tower and a Room overlooking the falls from the Canadian side; first night of fireworks too..
 
The answer to the question varies from state to state. That said the rational is more likely an attempt to protect the homeowner from incompetent or dishonest individuals. Think consumer protection, If it is your house and you screw it up you did it to yourself. Similarly there is no law from preventing you from performing surgery on yourself but if somebody else does it they must be licensed.

In California the exemption applies to single family residences that comply with the conventional framing provisions in the building code not the residential code. Thus some buildings that comply with the California Residential Code may still require an engineer. The term conventional framing was used in an earlier era and with the changes in the code it is not always clear what it means.
 
Back in the day, the term was "Type V" sheet compliance, basically 2x4 walls with short span ceiling joists and roof rafters on either slab or crawl space foundations.
 
ADAguy said:
Back in the day, the term was "Type V" sheet compliance, basically 2x4 walls with short span ceiling joists and roof rafters on either slab or crawl space foundations.
Click to expand...
Submittals for 600 square feet or less was a site plan and a copy of our 8.5"x11" type V sheets. We even had shear walls..... The rule was 600 sqft. 800 isn't much different than 600 and a 1001 of the same stuff...well shucks Ned, you're gonna need a bigger site to go along with that site-plan. Then it happened.

We can't build a garage without a Strong-Wall.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top